Ah. Well, I think that Paul is very strong on the border, port security, the coast guard -- these are the areas which I think are far more important to the actual Defense of America than is Iraq. Admittedly, Hunter's good on those issues also; I just don't think he's any kind of fiscal conservative, and that bothers me (a lot).
In Iraq, we have a choice between Sunni Terrorists on the one hand and Shi'ite Terrorists on the other. When Ronald Reagan faced that choice in Lebanon -- he left.
I believe that was the wise thing to do, and that Ron Paul's call for a restoration of Reaganite foreign policy is wise.
I do believe that the Sunnis and Shi'ites will continue to kill eachother if we leave Iraq; but I'm rooting for them to both Lose, anyway.
And how will leaving keep the M.E. terror monies and drugs coming in through Mexico?