[LtdGovt]

You surely know it doesn't work like that. Roe overturned all state law that regulated / banned abortion at the time. A reversal of Roe puts the responsibility / power back to the states.

This post is an insult to your own intelligence. Did you even read what Hunter had said? He expressly stated that he would only nominate people who would acknowledge that a fetus is a human being. Not candidates who see abortion as an improper infringement by the judicial caste on the legislative arena, but someone who sees a fetus as a human being. Thus, those people would likely impose a nationwide ban on abortion.

[don-o]

This post is an insult to your own intelligence.

Well, that's not hard to do. So glad to have your insight and great wisdom to correct such a dummy as I am.

Explain to me why a definition of an unborn human being as a person has anything to do with reversing Roe?

(please use small words and short sentences.) Thanks