[linda_22003]

At this point, you're perfectly free to get a social-conservative candidate the nomination through the primary process. People seem to be more focused on the "threat" of Rudy than doing that, though.

[nina0113]

People seem to be more focused on the "threat" of Rudy than doing that, though.

Only on this thread. At the moment, I'm planning to support Hunter. I'm waiting to see how he responds to his "macaca moment" - you know there'll be one! - before I commit any time or money.

[George W. Bush]

People seem to be more focused on the "threat" of Rudy than doing that, though.

It is entirely legitimate to draw people's attention to his record. Since polls indicate that only 20% of Republicans know his radical pro-abortion positions and history, it's fair game. Same with his position on sodomy rights and his very very messy personal life.

We don't have to commit to any other candidate to oppose a liberal. At this point, it's more about weeding out the unacceptable candidates and then looking at what's left.

Rudy is unacceptable. He's a liberal. He could and should run as a Democrat. For them, it would be a great improvement. But not for the GOP.