Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Giuliani: [to SC Firefighters & Police] 'A Woman Has the Right to Choose Abortion'
Associated Press/Newsmax.com ^ | 2.22.07 | staff report

Posted on 02/22/2007 7:27:03 AM PST by meg88

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-499 last
To: Mr. Silverback
Oh, and one other thing, if it's up to the states to determine whether a fetus is, in fact, a person, why isn't it up to the states to decide if owning an African is really an example of involuntary servitude?

Because we have a constitutional amendment. You need a constitutional amendment prohibiting abortion. It's not going to happen.
481 posted on 02/23/2007 9:58:28 AM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

That's fine, not nearly as bad as I expected. I support anything that will put criminals behind bar for a longer period.


482 posted on 02/23/2007 10:00:05 AM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

I saw you advocating Old Testament law in America on another thread, so I just guessed that you had affinity for extreme measures. Not in this case, though.


483 posted on 02/23/2007 10:01:20 AM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: LtdGovt
I saw you advocating Old Testament law in America on another thread

Oh yeah??

Where??

484 posted on 02/23/2007 10:26:09 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

My apologies, I checked it, and it wasn't true. My memory has a habit of 'remembering' things that aren't true.


485 posted on 02/23/2007 10:37:13 AM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
But... but.... if the court suddenly "found" that... that would be "judicial activism" and everyone's against that! Right?

If that were true, then every finding of fact by a court, every murder sentence, every divorce decree, every small claims award, every speeding ticket fine, all of it, would be judicial activism. In fact, a ruling by the court that a fetus is a human would be in its way sounder than a guilty sentence in a murder trial, since there is no real doubt that a fetus is not human, but the murderer was only convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Seriously, can you give me any scientific evidence that a fetus is not a human baby?

Saying that a fetus is a person and should not be murdered is no more judicial activism than if a court decreed that women named Linda are human and should not be murdered.

486 posted on 02/23/2007 10:45:05 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

We're talking past each other. You're speaking biologically - of course a human fetus is human, that's established. I'm talking about its personhood being established in law, which is a completely different question.


487 posted on 02/23/2007 10:47:59 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: LtdGovt

You and me both!


Slips happen...


Now back to our regular programming: Bashing Hillary and the Libs!!!


488 posted on 02/23/2007 1:32:13 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
I'm talking about its personhood being established in law, which is a completely different question.

It seems like it IS established.

Injure a pregnant woman and kill the 'fetus' and you get charged with murder - unless, of course, she WANTS it dead and you are wearing a white lab coat!

489 posted on 02/23/2007 1:33:53 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

What argument have I made regarding gun toters, and the Second Amendment? I'm all for you having the right to bear arms and tote those guns around, because I support the conservative principle that we are guaranteed individual liberty.

That's why I don't understand how "conservatives" can believe they have a right to own a gun, but that women don't have a right to their own body.

Please explain why you believe you are entitled to own a gun, but I'm not entitled to decide what to do with my body.
And if you would be so kind, I'd like to know what empowers you to make the choice for me, when the law says you do not.


490 posted on 02/23/2007 3:12:41 PM PST by LibWrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: LibWrangler

Two bodies and two lives at stake. The woman's and the baby's. The baby is a separate individual. The "mother" is entrusted with that life.


491 posted on 02/23/2007 3:17:47 PM PST by Jim Robinson (It's "originalists" not "constructionists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Thirty years of debates like "this thread" have changed nothing, including the law that guarantees my right to make choices about my body without having to answer to people like you.

If Americans wanted it different, something would have changed. Not enough people want it to change to cause them to take action.

Clue.


492 posted on 02/23/2007 3:19:03 PM PST by LibWrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
LOL! I was thinking more along the lines of Elizabeth Ross Silverback and Abigail Adams Silverback. Of course, my last name isn't really Silverback, but you get the idea.

The top of my list for boys is Joshua Chamberlain Silverback.

493 posted on 02/23/2007 3:26:08 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman
These social matters are handled at the State level.

So if your state issued hunting licenses and carcass bounties for people whose screen names start with the letter U, you would be OK with that?

494 posted on 02/23/2007 3:41:58 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman
These social matters are handled at the State level.

So if your state issued hunting licenses and carcass bounties for people whose screen names start with the letter U, you would be OK with that?

Oh, one other thing...What does the 14th Amendment say? What does it guarantee no government (that's NO government, not the federal government) may take from someone without due process?

495 posted on 02/23/2007 3:43:48 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: LtdGovt
Who said that I was talking about murder?

The issue we were discussing was the right to life. Perhaps you lost that train of thought somewhere along the way.

What a despicable showing of moral relativism.

So according to you, saying the murder of innocents is the same no matter what 'dress' it wears is moral relativism? Please explain. How is it 'relativism'?

Are you saying that America is a as bad as Islamic states?

I'm saying exactly what I said. Murder of innocents is horrid no matter who does it.

Why are you preaching hatred of America?

Please cut and paste where I ever said anything about hating America. Oh, that's right you can't. I never said such a thing.

But I forgive you for trying to be deceitful.

496 posted on 02/23/2007 6:17:24 PM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: LibWrangler
Thirty years of debates like "this thread" have changed nothing, including the law that guarantees my right to make choices about my body without having to answer to people like you.

You still have to answer to GOD.

How long was slavery 'legal' in this country before it was over turned?

30 years is nothing, and 'these threads' HAVE changed things.

497 posted on 02/24/2007 4:30:07 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: LibWrangler
Not enough people want it to change to cause them to take action.

You are right.

But the tipping point is getting closer...

498 posted on 02/24/2007 4:32:14 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Choosey mothers choose JIF®!

(We don't want no steeking salmonella!)

499 posted on 02/24/2007 4:34:14 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-499 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson