The 17 are probably doing the will of the people in their district. That's the real truth to be dealt with. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
The 17 are probably doing the will of the people in their district. That's the real truth to be dealt with. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
_______
If all Congresscritters do is "the will of the people" then WE DON'T NEED THEM. All we have to do is take polls and make laws from them.
Wait, that's called "mob rule."
No, Inglis was not doing the will of the people in his district. What the hell is he doing? I voted for that moron.
The way to deal with cowards is to kick their behinds to the rear and replace them with somebody else.
Isn't that what they are elected to do?
HEY! Stop making rational arguments!
This thread is about name calling and piling on!!!
How dare you point out that there are congressmen who sometimes actually represent their constituents!
I suspect the will of the people in any given district would be to direct a disproportionate share of the nation's wealth to the people in that district. That's why its a representative form of government.
"The 17 are probably doing the will of the people in their district. That's the real truth to be dealt with. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't."
I don't care, they are RINO's all! They could have done the right thing and voted against the resolution. They could then tell the folks in their districts they were doing what was right in support of our troops and their mission against the terrorists. My mailer from the Republican Party went back empty with a note telling them I was not donating to let any of my support go to any Republicans who would vote for the Dem resolution. Also told them I have and will continue to donate only to Duncan Hunter at this time!
Guess again.
One of those 17 was mine and he did NOT do my will. I wrote him twice tonight.