Posted on 02/05/2007 4:29:36 PM PST by EternalVigilance
The cornerstone of Gov. Mitt Romney's new universal health care law for Massachusetts is a program titled "Commonwealth Care", a plan for thousands of low-income people who could not afford regular health insurance, funded by the taxpayers.
One of the stated benefits covered in Commonwealth Care is "abortions." And Planned Parenthood is written into the law, as part of the "payment policy advisory board."
April 12, 2006. Gov. Mitt Romney signs Massachusetts Universal Health Care law, as Sen. Ted Kennedy, standing behind him, gives his approval and support.
McCain, Rudy and Mitt...the three stooges of the left. Which is the biggest liberal? Find out next week.
ping
ping...
So, is there anyway around nationalized health care? Seems like everyone is pushing for it - only difference is the details. Although I'm sure these clowns will make sure they are covered under some other program.
Why can't we have a legitimate conservative contender?
Well, I can only give you my opinion on that.
I think it's a tossup which one of the Rudy McRomney trio is the biggest liberal. Take your pick.
However, I do think that Willard Mitt is the most deceptive about it.
There's still time.
Thanks very much for posting. BTTT!
Gee, I thought that Mr. Romney was a pro-lifer by this point.
Doesn't seem very pro-life to me.
Ah, I see you're still posting articles by the guy who voted for Michael Dukakis. lol
LOL -- I said years ago, just wait. When national healthcare becomes reality, it will be a Republican who brings it to you.
Speaking of time, just a summary glance at the amount of time you have on your hand to do opposition research against the Republican Party, I'd say nobody's hired you yet, huh?
The information he is providing stands up just fine all by itself, no matter how hard you and your friends work to try and kill the messenger.
Are you claiming that RomneyCare doesn't use taxpayer money to fund abortions?
Do you have a problem with taxpayers who consider abortion to be murder being forced to help pay for them?
Hey, somebody's got to funnel this information to the FR slasher research team!
I'm not doing op research "on the Republican Party." I'm doing it on liberals who are lying and claiming they're fit to lead the party of Reagan conservatives.
No my friend. These are all still after shocks of the Clinton Administration.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1563271/posts
Healthy People 2010
LOL!
Well, if you can believe that someone who voted for Dukakis can become a "conservative", you should have no trouble believing that Romney is no longer pro-abortion. So what's the problem? You're stuck in 1994 with a Dukakis groupie. LOL
Yep. The Republican party has become almost unrecognizable over the past couple of years.
Seems like Republican SOP these days it to offer a watered down version of whatever democrat socialists scheme that seems popular at the moment and call it the conservative alternative.
If the Republican candidate ends up being Rudy, Mitt, or McCain I'm going to bail out of the party and find a conservative alternative. I know I'll get flamed for that but this is getting ridiculous - a republican funding abortion with tax dollars while claiming to be pro-life? Bizarro world.
THIS is the reason I will not vote for Mitt Romney...or anyone else who mouths the blasphemy "universal health care", hurts my ears
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.