I am a conservative but also a conservationist. We have cut down 95% of the old growth redwoods. The remaining giants are a national treasure. I say save them at all costs.
ditto
Out of curiosity, who do you think should pay for these "costs"?
As long as we are exchanging opinions, I'm a conservative and detest conservationist. Conservationist = Liberalism.
You, and the others who want redwoods "saved" already have a perfect way to actualize your views - buy redwood land.
Until then, have you considered whether you have the right to bill those who don't support your "preservationist perspectives"?
Just wondering.