Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: windchime
In truth, the decision to protect Berger may have more to do with saving the Clinton legacy than with stabilizing the nation.

That's my take on it. Also, the two chief reasons for this happening.

1) President Bush is too damned polite. But it's not the President's job to be polite to traitors. When you are president, you can't always follow your personal inclinations.

2) President Bush left too damned many traitors in the FBI, the CIA, and the Justice Department. These people still work for clinton, and therefore work against the administration, and therefore work against our country (not that they minded doing that even while they were in power).

I suppose reason #2 was also the mistake of being too damned polite, too ready to be bipartisan, when the other side is partisan to the core and couldn't care less if they betray their country.

25 posted on 01/25/2007 11:38:04 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

". . . when the other side is partisan to the core and couldn't care less if they betray their country."

So true!


43 posted on 01/25/2007 12:40:08 PM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson