Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2007 1:23:01 AM PST by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman
The Mig 35 is one fine aircraft.

For me to poop on!

2 posted on 01/24/2007 1:58:08 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

MIG-35

RULE: Articles about aircraft must include a pic! :-)

3 posted on 01/24/2007 2:58:24 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman; Bon mots
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us The Mig-29OVT,which is now called the Mig-35
10 posted on 01/24/2007 9:36:50 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
1.3 million active personnel

Any of'em for rent?

17 posted on 01/24/2007 10:09:48 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Hoc est punctum quod inter gentes ferro et ignes dividitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Bump for later reading


22 posted on 01/24/2007 11:44:51 AM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/mfi.htm

MiG-35 / 1.42 Multirole Front-Line Fighter [MFI]
The new MiG Multirole Front-Line Fighter [MFI - Mnogofounksionalni Frontovoi Istrebiel ] was unveiled publicly on 12 January 1999. The project has been under development since 1986, is variously designated the 1.42, the 1.44, I-42 and I-44 - the "MiG-35" and "MiG-39" designations are informally applied by some observers. 1-42 and 1-44 believed to be designations of the two prototypes, with the 1.44 used for the flight-test airframe(s). This multi-functional front-line fifth-generation fighter was developed by the MIG [Mikoyan & Gurevich] aviation scientific and production complex of the MAPO military-industrial corporation.

The first prototype was delivered early in 1994, and in December 1884 taxi-tests were conducted following which further work was suspended due to a shortage of funds. The 35-ton fighter features a single under-fuselage air intake with two AL41F engines of 20 tons thrust each, and a top speed of over 2,500 km/h. The twin-tail "duck" planform features an all-moving canard-type foreplane with a wingspan of about 15 meters and a length of about 20 meters.

The MAPO-MiG enterprise claims the new fighter would be able to outperform the F-22 Raptor, the most advanced US air-superiority fighter. Although the primary mission of the MFI is air-superiority, unlike the F-22 the MFI is also capable of performing strike mission, and thus in both conception and configuration is more directly comparable to the similar multi-role EFA2000 Eurofighter. Like the American F-22, the MFI has a thrust vectoring system that allows it to make sharp turns. It also has similar stealth capabilities, with the canard, wing and fuselage structures incorporating carbon-fiber and polymer composite materials. Other stealth features include radar-absorbing covering, screening of radar-visible structure elements, and reduced heat signature. The fifth-generation pulse-doppler radar has a phased-array andtenna with electronic scanning to simultaneously attack over 20 targets. The aircraft can carry long-range air-to-air and air-to-surface guided missiles, and it is armed with a 30-mm cannon.

In March 1997, military officials scrapped plans to manufacture the MFI because it was too expensive. The Defense Ministry supported the MFI development program, and would decide on production following flight tests that could take up to seven years. The Russian air force will not gain one new, state-of-the-art warplane before the year 2005 because of insufficient financing. No new warplanes had been acquired since 1996.

The MiG corporation asserted that a first test flight happened in late 2000, in which object 1.44 spent a few minutes in the air. However, neither representatives of the Defense Ministry, nor journalists saw that flight. And by 2001 it was apparent that the MiG-35 would not enter development or production.
23 posted on 01/24/2007 12:20:39 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

This thread has more information including radar details and some more photos:

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=48566

Bear in mind that most inhabitants of that site are model builders and other fanboys. Exercise caution when they start pontificating.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F


24 posted on 01/24/2007 2:03:30 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F (Kitchener faced a 'Mahdi Army' too... how'd that work out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Why is everyone comparing the Mig-35 to the F-22? Unless India plans to go to war with the United States, the Mig-35 is a much more sensible option; the F-22 is overkill for a nation that has little interest in global military projection. Like most nations, India is beefing up it’s military as form of defense. The F-22 is purely an offensive weapon, and an expensive one at that. Besides, the F-22 is not in the package the United States offered India; the United States is offering the F-16 and the F-18 as competiton to Russia’s Mig 35, so this whole debate is mute.


30 posted on 02/16/2008 10:32:03 PM PST by Stev0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson