[CharlesWayneCT]

Neither of those are sources. They are both articles repeating a rumor with no evidence.

A "source" would be a name of a person with knowledge of the event.

[antisocial]

"A "source" would be a name of a person with knowledge of the event."

Well, if they aren't telling the truth, the prosecutor can go after them for lible. Lets see if he does.