No, I believe an officer of the court/federal prosecuter, two BP agents, the collected evidence, and the judgment of at least 10 members of the 12-member jury. Well, not that I believe them, but that I have no reason to believe the latest stories from two convicted BP agents OVER all these other people, for whom nobody has presented any evidence that they are lying, or a good reason why they would be more likely to lie than the two convicted agents.
My opinion is bolstered by looking just at the statements of the two BP agents. If we are to believe the official statements they signed, they never shot at the guy at all. Of course, that was before evidence was discovered in his BUTT. Then they changed their story, and gave several versions, some at odds with the other agents on the scene.
And how about this. The BP agents had to give a reason why other BP agents testified against them. SO they claim that the one agent is working with the drug dealers (the one that turned them in) and the other agents are all LYING because they all knew a shooting took place, and didn't report it, so they could all be suspended for 5 days.
In other words, you want me to believe two BP agents because they are BP agents, even though they lied on their official report. But in order to believe them (because they wouldn't lie, even to stay out of jail for 10 years, because they are good men, and BP agents), you want me to believe that ALL THE OTHER BP AGENTS are scumbag liars who would sell out their buddies just to avoid a 5-day suspension.
Oh, that's not fair -- it isn't YOU that want me to believe that, it's the two convicted BP agents. You just want me to believe that there is a vast government conspiracy to open our borders to drug dealers, and that Bush spent 6 years appointing crooked prosecuters and appointing clueless judges so that he could railroad BP agents who tried to defend our borders by shooting unarmed men in the back as they try to run back into Mexico.