Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Student Fails Test, Must Pay Full Tuition[$127K]
WJZ ^ | 18 Jan 2007 | AP

Posted on 01/19/2007 6:17:18 AM PST by FLOutdoorsman

A Naval Academy midshipman who was expelled after he failed a running test will have to pay the Navy for the cost of his education.

Baltimore County resident Frank Shannon had asked that the 127-thousand dollar bill be waived. But a senior Navy official rejected his appeal this month, saying the academy provided Shannon with ample opportunity to meet its minimum fitness standards.

Shannon failed 12 of 18 fitness tests, and failed in a series of attempts to run a mile-and-a-half in 10 minutes and 30 seconds. In his final test, he was 20 seconds short. He was expelled just weeks before graduation.

Shannon is hoping a member of Congress will intervene. Aides to Senator Mikulski suggested he apply for readmission to the academy, but Shannon is currently married and would first have to divorce his wife before applying.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: academy; fatbody; naval; navy; tuition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-311 next last
To: mbynack

"My impression is that this guy is a jock who had been given special privileges throughout his academic career."
Your impression is wrong. Jocks are not admitted to the National Honor Society because they can shoot baskets, block defensive lineman or throw the discus. Hence your comparision to the officers you know/knew is not valid.

He tried to become an officer and serve his country even taking desperate steps to do so and is now getting whacked for his efforts.


181 posted on 01/19/2007 10:25:43 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman

For those people that don't know (Iknow you do), they might be wondering about the less than impressive standards to get into the different schools like jump school or SEAL training.

The entrance requirements do not reflect the condition the individual will be in when he finishes.

These schools, especially the Airborne and Ranger schools, take in people of different ages, different branches of the service, different ranks, and even different countries. The physical requirements to enter the schools are simply to verify that the individual is able enough to start the course.


Do any of the old timers remember how the old Army 500 point PT test was scored?


182 posted on 01/19/2007 10:28:04 AM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

500, wow, never heard of that one. We use the 300 point scoring. It got ALOT easier around, 98 or 99, when they changed the scoring system.


183 posted on 01/19/2007 10:32:13 AM PST by FLOutdoorsman (The Man who says it can't be done should not interrupt the man doing it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Held up out of the water. Splashes didn't count. But you surely would not want the weapon to go under.

OK, explained that way it makes sense. Thanks.

184 posted on 01/19/2007 10:36:29 AM PST by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
He tried to become an officer and serve his country even taking desperate steps to do so and is now getting whacked for his efforts.

He's not getting whacked for his efforts - he's getting whacked for his lack of effort. The physical fitness test is just one of the standards that they have to meet to graduate. It's not a big secret that they spring on them at the last minute - they know about it from the first week of school. As other posters have pointed out, it's not an extremely demanding fitness test. It sounds like the guy was too busy keeping his GPA up to spend time on a workout program and now he's paying the price. Obviously his instructors and advisors at the academy felt that his failure was due to a lack of effort and that's why they didn't go to bat for him.

If the Navy waives the standards for people who can't meet them, why have a standard at all?

185 posted on 01/19/2007 10:38:13 AM PST by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: All

I'm an ex Air Force officer, not Navy. A gentleman above noted extra help that would have been given this kid and this is probably the most critical thing -- and it's something the Air Force did, too, back in the day.

When there was a cadet who was not a screw-off and who wanted it badly and had done the work and paid the various prices -- but seemed to have run into some particular qualification limitation that was stopping him cold, you moved heaven and earth to help him. The whole squadron would work with him and try to help. His flight commander, squadron commander and group commander would be out there working with him to try to help. You did not abandon someone who was trying. And if that cadet still couldn't do it and if that cadet did extra duties in something else and excelled in something else to try to compensate, then you read between the lines of every possible regulation to try to find cause for waiver. When you live and train with people 24/7 for months, you know deserves gold bars on their shoulder and who does not.

This particular kid . . . there's something here we don't know. He sounds a bit screwy, actually. Something is buried under this story we don't know.


186 posted on 01/19/2007 10:43:21 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: LongElegantLegs

It must be those long elegant legs.


187 posted on 01/19/2007 11:01:24 AM PST by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

Some standards are arbitrary as this thread has shown. These in question are higher than those in the rest of the Navy and the other service academies.

Wasting talent and dedicated men is not a wish policy.


188 posted on 01/19/2007 11:01:44 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Owen
"When you live and train with people 24/7 for months, you know deserves gold bars on their shoulder and who does not"

I agree, something is being left out in this story.

189 posted on 01/19/2007 11:05:06 AM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Thinking back to my cadet days I bet the cadet pissed someone off.

When I was in Army ROTC during advance camp, my buddy got a 3, average score. We were all shocked. We expected him to get a 5 which was the highest score. I asked what might of happened. He said he was in charge and given a mission. The CPT told him how to do it. My buddy completed the mission his own way. He said after that mission the CPT treated him different.

The next spring at a Ranger challenge competion, my buddy met his other TAC officer from camp. The TAC officer apologized to my buddy that he got a 3 and wanted to make sure it hadn't affected my friends chance to go active duty. This TAC officer was junior to the 1st CPT and got overruled on givng my buddy a grade of 4 or 5. It made my buddy feel better about his ranking at the time.

To not let this guy go enlisted seems a waste when he already qualifed for enlisted nuc school which is suppose to have a high wash out rate. It seems crazy when were at a time of war that they would just let him go.







190 posted on 01/19/2007 11:05:24 AM PST by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer
...and getting a 10-meter enema if you land wrong isn't fun.......

I knew a guy who "landed wrong" and ruptured his bladder - a year later he still looked like warmed-over death.

191 posted on 01/19/2007 11:06:17 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NOLA_homebrewer

Is it possible to graduate from the academy but not be commissioned? Get a degree but not the gold bars?

I'm sure the academy has had some senior have a car accident which medically disqualifed them but then allow the senior to graduate with a degree.


192 posted on 01/19/2007 11:09:39 AM PST by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I don't remember point scoring in 1962,3,4,5, but do know we had several additional exercises to complete. Well remember hand walking under the ladder rungs.


193 posted on 01/19/2007 11:10:33 AM PST by TweetEBird007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman

It is not at all unusual to have 5 or 10 slobs who stay over the summer after they should have graduated while trying to get their PT scores in line. It is very unusual for someone to fail to earn their commission. Passing a basic run test when you are given 2 to 3 months where you have nothing to do but work out and get your run times in order is not a massive task.

We sign a contract by showing up for class at the beginning of our junior year. The night before classes start used to be called 2-for-7 night ... now it's 2-for-8. When you are marked present in any academic class of your third year you have lost your ability to walk away. You are at that point obligated and under contract with the government.

After that point - if you either want to quit or are booted - if you are physically eligible for service - then you may be sent to the fleet as an enlisted Sailor to recompense Uncle Sam for the education received (degree eligible or not). If you are physically unable to serve due to failure to meet performance standards - you may be deemed liable for the cost of your education. In this case he should get his degree, just not his commission.

In my day, not all that long ago, if a company mate was having trouble as the final PT test approached, or if a failure put someone on the remedial list, it was his company mates and class mates who were dragging him/her out of bed at 4:30 in the morning and taking them on runs and work out sessions. It was their shipmates who helped them watch their diet and motivate them in their training. We even had guys who went out, on their own time, and ran the test with people to help them keep a good pace and motivate them through the event.

I am 99.99% certain he was held over after graduation and allowed multiple opportunities against a known deadline to pass the test. I have little if any sympathy for his failure. He knew the deal, he took the benefits, and failed to keep up his end of the bargain.


194 posted on 01/19/2007 11:18:27 AM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLOutdoorsman
There is a good chance,if he was prior service, he could re-enlist,obtain his former rank,while fulfilling his obligation to serve.This was a common practice in all the services if you had been passed over for promotion as an officer with 18 or more time left before you could retire.You served out the remainder of the 20,and in many cases,were promoted to a higher rank.When you do retire,you retire at the highest rank obtained.A retired Sgt.,would be retired as an officer[03-04].That policy,I think,was only for prior enlistments,who later re-entered as an officer or officers canditate.Down side for this case was extreme resentment towards former officers.
195 posted on 01/19/2007 11:21:56 AM PST by xarmydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative; Liberty Valance
From what I recall of the Army's standards, if you didn't have a size 12 combat boot halfway up the distal portion of your alimentary canal... you were moving fast enough. I don't recall the Drill Sergeants mentioning any actual numbers. It's possible the Drill Sergeants weren't that good at math anyhow.
196 posted on 01/19/2007 11:22:48 AM PST by Brucifer (JF'n Kerry- "That's not just a paper cut, it's a Purple Heart!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: art_rocks

I suspect there is, but can't recall any specific cases off the top of my head. I'm pretty sure that if something happened through no fault of your own, major illness perhaps, you'd still gaduate. They may even let you participate in the ceremony, just not take the oath and swearing in.

There was the case of Joe Steffan, who got booted a week before graduating for being gay and is now a gay rights activist. He sued for multiple things, multiple times, and I think was eventually awarded his diploma.


197 posted on 01/19/2007 11:23:35 AM PST by NOLA_homebrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: meyer
I know, this is the navel academy


198 posted on 01/19/2007 11:26:57 AM PST by darkangel82 (Socialism is NOT an American value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TweetEBird007

"I don't remember point scoring in 1962,3,4,5, but do know we had several additional exercises to complete. Well remember hand walking under the ladder rungs."


When I took the test I was disappointed in only getting a 493 (losing a couple of seconds on the run), it seems that 8 weeks of basic wasn't enough to overcome 3 years of street living, bad diet and heavy smoking.

Besides the usual sit-ups, push-ups, and the two mile run in boots, we also did those horizontal ladder rungs for a timed, number count, and a timed agility course that involved a short course of obstacles and a ditch or two, it was to measure your ability to move quickly on uneven ground and (laterally?).

I think it was a very effective test for males.


199 posted on 01/19/2007 11:28:14 AM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt

Maybe he will go work for Al Qaeda or the Chinese.


200 posted on 01/19/2007 11:37:23 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson