Skip to comments.
Bush Set For Climate Change U-Turn
The Guardian (UK) ^
| Gaby Hinsliff - Juliette Jowit - Paul Harris
Posted on 01/14/2007 10:31:25 AM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-139 next last
To: blam
You have GOT to be kidding me. Thanks, G.W.!
61
posted on
01/14/2007 11:42:55 AM PST
by
dinodino
To: Howlin
You're showing your ignorance. Name one that we kept secret and that folks who wanted to see it had to FOIA it to read.
62
posted on
01/14/2007 11:42:57 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Bernard Marx
"Until the foundation of the Independent, the Guardian was the only serious national daily newspaper in Britain that was not clearly conservative in its political affiliation. The term "Guardian reader" is therefore often used pejoratively by those who do not agree with the paper or self-deprecatingly by those who do. The stereotype of a Guardian reader is a person with leftist or liberal politics rooted in the 1960s, working in the public sector, regularly eating lentils and muesli, living in north London wearing sandals and believing in alternative medicine and natural medicine as evidenced by Labour MP Kevin Hughes' largely rhetorical question in the House of Commons on November 19, 2001:
"Does my right hon. Friend find it bizarre as I do that the yoghurt- and muesli-eating, Guardian-reading fraternity are only too happy to protect the human rights of people engaged in terrorist acts, but never once do they talk about the human rights of those who are affected by them?"
63
posted on
01/14/2007 11:43:36 AM PST
by
kabar
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
sure we are
Where is the veto pen again?
You know the one he promised to use on mccain-feingold?
I guess he lost it.
64
posted on
01/14/2007 11:43:52 AM PST
by
flashbunny
(If the founding fathers were alive today, they'd be buying feathers and boiling tar.)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Amen! It's hard to tell a left wing moonbat from a right wing one nowadays.
65
posted on
01/14/2007 11:46:27 AM PST
by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: Howlin
If the agreement was undertaken in good faith, Howlin, and meant to be above board, why did taxpayers have to FOIA to get the info?
In light of that, trust but verify isn't displaying prejudice. It's just common sense.
66
posted on
01/14/2007 11:46:29 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: flashbunny
The Guardian (UK) is a tabloid newspaper. I'd go slow on believing anything in it if I were you.
67
posted on
01/14/2007 11:46:45 AM PST
by
Carolinamom
(To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible. -- President Bush)
To: blam
*sigh* Are there ,any more issues he can betray this country with? What's next, ICC?
68
posted on
01/14/2007 11:47:04 AM PST
by
processing please hold
(ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
To: flashbunny
Lay off the caffeine for a while and wait and see, since Congress has only been in session a little over a week.
69
posted on
01/14/2007 11:48:07 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Show me a 'true' Conservative and I'll show someone with bad knees)
To: L98Fiero
America needs to 'cooperate' in the Kyoto accord so that the falsely named "free trade" agenda of the corrupt globalists in our government can be advanced. Kyoto is a bargaining chip for the falsely named "free trade" agreements with the third world,China and India and Africa.
Its all about suffocating the American economy so that the 'boats' of the third world and lifted, and the transnational can make money outside of the influence of the American people.
70
posted on
01/14/2007 11:49:45 AM PST
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: mewzilla
Mewz, that has not been signed by the President. It is still an internal document.
Upon release (if he ever intends on signing it), there is time for debate on it, indeed, Congress has to ratify it IIRC.
71
posted on
01/14/2007 11:53:04 AM PST
by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: processing please hold
Do you believe everything you read in the Guardian? LOL!
How about lets wait and see before we tar and feather Bush. In fact, let's not only see what's said in the SOTU address but what actually makes it into legislation that passes both houses and is signed into law before we stick a knife in the guy, hmmmm....?
72
posted on
01/14/2007 11:53:59 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(I support the troops AND THE MISSION. I do not support Clintoons, RINOS or RATS.)
To: processing please hold
The source is a Leftist tabloid (similar to hemorroid) rag out if the UK.
Now get yourself some knee braces, that has to hurt!
73
posted on
01/14/2007 11:54:51 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Show me a 'true' Conservative and I'll show someone with bad knees)
To: hedgetrimmer
Thank you, just what we need!
Another "hedgetrimmer" manifesto on the evils of George Bush.
74
posted on
01/14/2007 11:58:09 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Show me a 'true' Conservative and I'll show someone with bad knees)
To: blam
When he invites Al Gore and Schwarzenkennedy to the WH to discuss the issue at a asummit, let me know. It may be time to fold up the big tent and move on come that day. ;-)
'Til then, we need to speed up the building of nuclear power plants,, and don't subsidize and patronize the alternative energy freaks and activists that carry on with this PassionPlay in public daily, in both parties. They are participating in othing more than a massive wealth transfer and emiisions trading scheme program for the rich and connnected, nothing more.
75
posted on
01/14/2007 12:07:43 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... California 2007,, Where's a script re-write guy when ya need 'em?)
To: alnick
Yeah, really. Bush should be impeached for all the things reports in lefty newspapers said he would do and he didn't.
76
posted on
01/14/2007 12:09:24 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
To: kabar
The Guardian is generally in sympathy with the liberal to left-wing ends of the political spectrum Ya think? Ya mean it hasn't changed its stripes since its days as the ultra-left-wing Manchester Guardian? What does that have to do with its sources? The New York Times is far left but it breaks White House secrets almost weekly. Leakers are leakers the world over.
To: Howlin
What is sad is that these people subconsciously place these things in their mental filing cabinet under "Rotten things Bush did" and then when they're asked about it, their list is shorter than they thought it was.
But they're still angry with him. They just can't remember why.
78
posted on
01/14/2007 12:12:56 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
To: prairiebreeze
I see what I see. The man I voted for in 2004 is not the man I see today. He's not conservative, our borders are a civil war waiting to happen, the rop expression he espouses at every turn has worn out my last nerve. They mean to see us subjugated or killed, no middle ground there.
If he was serious about the WOT our borders would have been sealed on 9-12-01. Illegal aliens and criminals have a right to collect Social Security. Our social programs are exploding. Terrorist are gonna have 'rights'. Our schools are now so leftist it's unbelievable.
Newspapers at will print our national secrets with no thought of Judicial retribution because there is none. Our government tried to postpone saddams execution. Three thousand of our bravest died to rid the world of that dangerous bastard.
Our prisons are filled with illegal aliens who rape, murder, and rob American citizens. Who pays the tab for their incarceration American taxpayers, the same people they are murdering.
All-in-all, this country has gone to hell in a hand basket since his reelection. I see what I see.
79
posted on
01/14/2007 12:15:07 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
To: alnick
You call a headline from Worldnetdaily that relies on the word "COULD" verification of something???I know. I didn't bother clicking the link, but I noticed "could".
More morons on this thread than a typical NAU thread.
80
posted on
01/14/2007 12:15:14 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson