Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
There's never been a war fought with fewer casualties. Ever.
Didn't the first Gulf War have fewer casualties?
120 posted on 01/13/2007 11:56:09 AM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Your Nightmare

That was more a military operation than a war, imo. We didn't control territory and depose a dictator.


130 posted on 01/13/2007 11:58:07 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Your Nightmare
Didn't the first Gulf War have fewer casualties?

Yes it did, on our side anyway. Remember though that the invasion itself lasted 100 hours.

145 posted on 01/13/2007 12:06:17 PM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson