Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EQAndyBuzz
No they wouldn't. Because if they did that would open up Pakistan and India using them in Kashmir, South & North Korea using them.

In a fight for your continued existance, you don't abstractly ponder the implications that using a tool to save your life might allegedly set a precidence for some criminal to abuse a similar tool against someone else.

"Detatched reflection is not required in the presenece of an upraised knife."

29 posted on 01/08/2007 11:29:46 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

"In a fight for your continued existance, you don't abstractly ponder the implications that using a tool to save your life might allegedly set a precidence for some criminal to abuse a similar tool against someone else."

Sure you do. Israel's existence was directly threatened this past summer by the animals who seek to destroy it. Instead of inflicting collateral damage to make a point that Israel's enemies have nowhere to hide, Israel chose to fight a war based on negative CNN coverage.

You really think with Iran having a nuke Israel would launch a preemptive strike? If that is the case, they would have done it before Iran could set in motion a defensive strategy to prevent an Israel strike.

Iran with a nuke only guarantees one thing, that Israel will be forced to fight a conventional war against Syria and the Hezzies with Iranian and European support.

A preemptive nuke strike opens up the idea of a nuclear exchange in regional conflicts.



32 posted on 01/08/2007 11:52:21 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson