1 posted on
01/02/2007 12:37:28 PM PST by
shineon
To: shineon
They had to put their principles aside and do this -- Romney wouldn't sign their pay raises until they got off their butts on this thing.
Money usurps principle with Dim's every time.
2 posted on
01/02/2007 12:43:59 PM PST by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: shineon
I have a question for the legal eagles among us.
What happens to the validity of the several thousand gay marriages that have already taken place if the gay marriage ban becomes law?
Are there any ex-post-facto ramifications?
4 posted on
01/02/2007 12:44:59 PM PST by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: shineon
Earlier in the day, Gov-elect Deval Patrick had met with Travaglini and House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi to urge against a vote, calling it a "question of conscience."Yeah, just ignore the state constitution....use it for toilet paper.
To: shineon; gidget7
Now, according to a caller to Howie's show, travelinni and dimassi don't have quorum to hold a 'reconsideration' vote. Pleased as I am that the amendment gets to go to the voters, I can't account for why the 'rats held this vote. They had seemed determined to subvert the rule of law and violate the Commonwealth's constitution... I wonder what changed their mind....or did they figure they could just kill it with this 'reconsideration' maneuver.
18 posted on
01/02/2007 12:58:26 PM PST by
ProCivitas
(Each Nation Should Be Its Own Best Market First.)
To: shineon
This isn't over yet folks. The legislatures are now trying to reconsider the question and the vote, and they are now trying to get a majority of pro-gay marriage legislatures to "twist enough arms" to get the next vote to be less than 50 legislatures who are for the '08 ballot question. If the next vote does end up taking place and not enough legislatures (less than 50 legislatures) for for the '08 ballot question, then the legislatures will say that they didn't break any laws and then go home!
To: shineon
Shhhh!!! There are Freepers on another thread that are trying to make the case that Romney actually supports gay marriage and his support of this constitutional amendment is phony. Careful, they might be introduced to reality!
To: shineon
I am quite surprised to hear this.
I still do not believe that us Massachusetts voters will be allowed to vote on this issue ever.
This matter is going to end up decided by a U.S. Constitutional Amendment.
27 posted on
01/02/2007 2:14:43 PM PST by
Radix
(Tag Line undergoing maintenance right now.)
To: shineon
31 posted on
01/03/2007 3:30:59 AM PST by
Silly
(sarcasmoff.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson