Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TWohlford
" Perhaps, just perhaps, we should pay better money so that we get justices that actually are competent?"

Perhaps the argument would have merit if there was a list of those that had turned down the offer of a seat on the bench because it doesn't pay well enough?
24 posted on 01/01/2007 7:45:30 AM PST by Beagle8U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Beagle8U

Where is it written that judging has to be their life long occupation? Work in the free market for a while, then do your public service for a while. Go back to the free market if it becomes to burdensome.


33 posted on 01/01/2007 7:48:26 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Beagle8U
Perhaps the argument would have merit if there was a list of those that had turned down the offer of a seat on the bench because it doesn't pay well enough? Actually there WAS a long list of judges who asked NOT to be considered for the last two vacancies.
71 posted on 01/01/2007 8:11:00 AM PST by LC HOGHEAD (Thirty years ago scientists warned about "Global Cooling" and a New Ice Age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Beagle8U

It occurs to me that, since the entire court system is not a market system but is created by our government, it isn't right for lawyers to benefit so much from it while ordinary taxpayers pay for all the costs.

I suggest that officers of the court be assessed a tax so that we can pay the judges properly.


208 posted on 01/01/2007 9:48:43 AM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson