Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: s_asher

Most people still want to adopt babies, healthy babies. Little interest in children over three. I've never understood why, I mean a diaper free child would be perfect.


8 posted on 12/19/2006 1:05:48 PM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: timsbella

When a child over three is available for adoption in the US, it's almost always because s/he has been subjected to severe abuse and/or neglect. Dealing with the effects of that (often permanent) is a whole lot worse than changing diapers for a while. I applaud those who are willing to take it on, as long as they're doing it with a realistic idea of what they're getting into. I think it's extremely unwise to do if there are other young children already in the home, or if there's still a possibility of the parents having a baby of their own. Some of these horribly damaged kids have grown up to do horrible things to their adoptive parents and siblings.


45 posted on 12/19/2006 8:25:22 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: timsbella

"Most people still want to adopt babies, healthy babies. Little interest in children over three. I've never understood why, I mean a diaper free child would be perfect."

People want to be able to mold kids as their own. By the age f four or five, a lot of the molding that will determine much of a child's personality and future as an adult has already been done.


53 posted on 01/08/2007 11:10:13 PM PST by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson