[Jacquerie]

The path of partisan division is well worn, but the road of compassionate priorities and social justice will lead us to a new America," he concluded.

Yes, as F.A. Hayek explained 60 years ago, it will lead to serfdom.

[csn vinnie]

This guy's about as non-partisan as Rev. Jesse Jackson.

[Vinny]

When questioned by secularists who are distressed by Wallis's "evangelical" identity, he likens himself to 19th-century evangelicals who opposed slavery and child labor.

Of course, most of today's evangelicals do not define themselves by their social causes but rather by their personal faith in Jesus Christ
____________________________________________

There you go.

Democrats are shameless. Does anyone think democrats care about what God thinks unless it's for their own political advantage to do so?

Image no Substance. Ghosts.

[Reo]

"The senator thought a non-partisan religious leader could speak to the moral values our nation needs," Wallis explained beforehand "

Only an idiot like Reid could consider Wallis a "non-partisan".

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP

[ripley]

"harry reid asks jim wallace to speak for democrats..."

he doesn't need to bother jim wallace. he can get mr. chavez to do it, real easy.

[doug from upland]

What a lying sack of it. He is a Dem leftist hack.

[Boazo]

[mckenzie7]

The Republican advantage among churchgoers as a whole slipped from 18 points to 12 points. Meanwhile, Democrats made significant gains among Catholics and non-evangelical Protestants. But evangelicals remained a pillar of Republican loyalty while the party lost ground among almost every other demographic group. Which is where Wallis comes in.

This is one Catholic that has abandoned the rat party. Many other Catholics that I have spoken with have also done that. I think that the rats need to worry more about us disillusioned Catholics.