Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Religious Left's Rebuttal: Harry Reid asks Jim Wallis to speak for the Democrats.
Weekly Standard ^ | 12/13/2006 | Mark D. Tooley

Posted on 12/13/2006 3:52:24 PM PST by rhema

ON SATURDAY, December 2, incoming-Senate majority leader Harry Reid asked Jim Wallis, the liberal religious activist, to give the Democrats' official response to President Bush's weekly radio address. It was a curious, odd moment--the equivalent of Republicans inviting Jerry Falwell to respond on their behalf to a Democratic president.

"The senator thought a non-partisan religious leader could speak to the moral values our nation needs," Wallis explained beforehand to his Sojourners constituency. Wallis, author of the best-selling God's Politics and a once angry-toned 1960s street activist has in recent years attempted to become the chief spokesman for the evangelical left. His radio stint in the place of congressional Democrats suggests he may have finally succeeded.

IN THE 2004 ELECTIONS, evangelical voters were the Republican's party's largest and most reliable constituency. Since then, Democrats have focused on peeling away the GOP's advantage among conservative Protestants.

Democratic efforts to refocus evangelicals away from gay marriage and abortion in favor of the environment and poverty seem mostly to have failed. In 2004, the Republican advantage among evangelicals was 74 percent to 25 percent. In 2006, it slipped only a few points, to 70 percent to 28 percent. (White evangelicals accounted for a quarter of the electorate in both 2004 and 2006.)

The Republican advantage among churchgoers as a whole slipped from 18 points to 12 points. Meanwhile, Democrats made significant gains among Catholics and non-evangelical Protestants. But evangelicals remained a pillar of Republican loyalty while the party lost ground among almost every other demographic group. Which is where Wallis comes in.

FOR HIS OWN PART, Wallis has made a show of declaiming the significance of his radio address. He said that accepting Reid's radio broadcast invitation, which is normally reserved for Democratic office holders, was a "difficult decision."

"I work hard to maintain my independence and non-partisanship, and didn't want to be perceived as supporting one party over the other," Wallis explained on his Sojourners website. "But it was an occasion to get our message to millions of people, so I decided to accept" and "act in a new way." Wallis insisted that he would have responded just as favorably to a Republican invitation.

Wallis's broadcast stressed his supposed non-partisan identity. "I want to be clear that I am not speaking for the Democratic party, but as a person of faith who feels the hunger in America for a new vision of our life together, and sees the opportunity to apply our best moral values to the urgent problems we face." He hit his usual notes about an "anti-poverty agenda" that reduces "the gap between rich and poor," about extricating U.S. troops from a "disastrous" war in Iraq, about protecting the "earth and the fragile atmosphere" from global warming, and about finding "common ground" to reduce abortions.

"The path of partisan division is well worn, but the road of compassionate priorities and social justice will lead us to a new America," he concluded. "Building that new America will require greater moral leadership from both Democrats and Republicans, and also from each and every one of us."

Wallis's rhetoric today is more soothing and mainstream than it was in 1996, when he denounced President Clinton for backing welfare reform. Clinton, Wallis then said, had "sacrificed" the most vulnerable upon the "altar of political expediency," unleashing what was sure to be a "hurricane of human suffering." But the hurricane never came and Wallis realized that '60s-style hyperbole was no longer politically viable. He shifted, at least rhetorically, from far left to center left.

Not wanting to antagonize evangelicals or secular liberals, Wallis now tries to navigate carefully around social issues. He warns against "scapegoating" homosexuals, while not specifically supporting same-sex unions. He wants to reduce abortions through enlarged social programs, without directly addressing proposed legal restrictions on abortions. He remains a pacifist but usually avoids mentioning that fact, instead condemning the Iraq war as unjust without broadcasting his view that all military action is unacceptable. When questioned by secularists who are distressed by Wallis's "evangelical" identity, he likens himself to 19th-century evangelicals who opposed slavery and child labor.

Of course, most of today's evangelicals do not define themselves by their social causes but rather by their personal faith in Jesus Christ and the authority of the Bible. Wallis is more akin to early 20th-century Social Gospel advocates who rejected "fundamentalism" in favor of progressive social reform. Their spiritual descendants are now primarily the clerisy of declining, liberal mainline Protestantism, whose demographic implosion cleared the way for evangelical predominance.

Attempting to speak to seriously religious Americans, especially to the growing evangelical demographic, is smart for Democrats. Whether or not Jim Wallis--a former Students for a Democratic Society agitator--is the Democrats' best tool for this outreach, is a very open question.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrat; dims; dumbocrats; rats; wallis

1 posted on 12/13/2006 3:52:32 PM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema
The path of partisan division is well worn, but the road of compassionate priorities and social justice will lead us to a new America," he concluded.

Yes, as F.A. Hayek explained 60 years ago, it will lead to serfdom.

2 posted on 12/13/2006 3:56:44 PM PST by Jacquerie (Great nations are born stoic and die epicurean. Will Durant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
"Beware the false prophets..."
3 posted on 12/13/2006 4:01:22 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema

This guy's about as non-partisan as Rev. Jesse Jackson.


4 posted on 12/13/2006 4:10:48 PM PST by csn vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csn vinnie

yadda, yadda, yadda. We know all about the religious left, about how "blessed are the peacemakers" and how Jesus taught us that we should care for the poor.

Did Jesus teach us that we need open ended welfare programs, Section 8 housing, food stamps, etc. all run by a giant federal bureaucracy? Would Jesus be content if private faith based charities were in the mix? Or would Jesus defer to the ACLU regarding whether faith based charities were legitimate?


5 posted on 12/13/2006 4:28:05 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhema

When questioned by secularists who are distressed by Wallis's "evangelical" identity, he likens himself to 19th-century evangelicals who opposed slavery and child labor.

Of course, most of today's evangelicals do not define themselves by their social causes but rather by their personal faith in Jesus Christ
____________________________________________

There you go.

Democrats are shameless. Does anyone think democrats care about what God thinks unless it's for their own political advantage to do so?

Image no Substance. Ghosts.


6 posted on 12/13/2006 4:40:11 PM PST by Vinny (What is a liberal? Someone that is a friend of every country but his own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
"The senator thought a non-partisan religious leader could speak to the moral values our nation needs," Wallis explained beforehand "

Only an idiot like Reid could consider Wallis a "non-partisan".

7 posted on 12/13/2006 5:53:06 PM PST by Reo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

INTREP


8 posted on 12/13/2006 5:53:33 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

"social justice will lead us to a new america..."

social justice is when everything is distributed equally to everyone in society and everyone is watched to make sure they have not one iota more than anyone else.

then comes the new criminal code and the disappearances in the middle of the night. then everyone will be equally afraid.

ah....a new america.


9 posted on 12/13/2006 6:10:36 PM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema

"harry reid asks jim wallace to speak for democrats..."

he doesn't need to bother jim wallace. he can get mr. chavez to do it, real easy.


10 posted on 12/13/2006 6:12:34 PM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

What a lying sack of it. He is a Dem leftist hack.


11 posted on 12/13/2006 6:14:25 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

12 posted on 12/13/2006 6:48:27 PM PST by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
The Republican advantage among churchgoers as a whole slipped from 18 points to 12 points. Meanwhile, Democrats made significant gains among Catholics and non-evangelical Protestants. But evangelicals remained a pillar of Republican loyalty while the party lost ground among almost every other demographic group. Which is where Wallis comes in.

This is one Catholic that has abandoned the rat party. Many other Catholics that I have spoken with have also done that. I think that the rats need to worry more about us disillusioned Catholics.
13 posted on 12/13/2006 10:16:47 PM PST by mckenzie7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson