Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Senate Overrides Gun Law Veto
Ohio News Netword ^

Posted on 12/12/2006 11:57:24 AM PST by wheelgun

The Ohio Senate voted Tuesday to override outgoing Gov. Bob Taft's veto of a bill that would wipe out local gun laws, marking the first time in 29 years the Legislature have rejected a gubernatorial veto.

The GOP-dominated Senate voted 21-12 to override the Republican governor's veto. Three Republicans voted against overriding, and three Democrats voted in favor of an override, including the attorney general-elect Marc Dann of Youngstown. The House, also controlled by Republicans, voted to overturn Taft's veto last week.

(Excerpt) Read more at onnnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: banglist; concealed; hb347; taft; veto

1 posted on 12/12/2006 11:57:27 AM PST by wheelgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wheelgun
Way to go Ohio...
2 posted on 12/12/2006 12:00:24 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheelgun

See also:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1752355/posts


3 posted on 12/12/2006 12:01:36 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie


You took the words right out of my mouth...


4 posted on 12/12/2006 12:21:10 PM PST by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wheelgun

Boy, Taft really stunk up Ohio for the GOP. I am glad to see that jerk gone.


5 posted on 12/12/2006 12:34:34 PM PST by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheelgun
Three Republicans voted against overriding

Now those 3 comrades need to be override.

6 posted on 12/12/2006 12:37:00 PM PST by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 9/12/01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Let's not rejoice yet. Wait to see if somebody files a lawsuit that lets an activist judge invalidate the override vote.

Let's not assume that's not possible.


7 posted on 12/12/2006 12:37:38 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wheelgun

"...override outgoing Gov. Bob Taft's veto of a bill that would wipe out local gun laws,..."

override (negate) ...... veto (negate) ... bill to wipe out (negate) local gun laws.

Thus supporting state level preemption of local/municipal gun control...... whew!


HUZZAH!!! Virginia "Sic Semper Tyrannis" did this a year or so ago, and the boon has been most felt in Northern Virgina. Increased access to gun shows now that county-gov-critters couldn't impose heinous waiting periods (30 days in Arlington!), a potential for more gunshops, and dissolution of the stupida55 patchwork quilt of legislation covering concealed carry.

Way to go
O HI O!!!!!


Top sends


8 posted on 12/12/2006 1:05:01 PM PST by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! "On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" By David Grossman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheelgun

Is the Taft name now pretty much dead in Ohio politics now, thanks to this RINO wimp corrupt loser?

After this disgrace (Taft IV), I half expect the Cincy law firm of Taft, Stettinius & Hollister to change its name to Stettinius & Hollister.

The great Tafts of the past would be ashamed of this guy.


9 posted on 12/12/2006 1:20:14 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

why is it liberals usually whine the loudest about" home rule" linking it to slavery but when it comes to the second ammendment "home rule" is a good thing?? The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds does it?
we need politicians who regard the second ammendment ,like the rest of the BORs as an individual right and we need a national carry law. If I am a responsible enough citizen to have had a carry permit for over 20 years and can carry in my state why am I suddenly not a good enough citizen to carry in any state?


10 posted on 12/12/2006 1:37:30 PM PST by riverdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: riverdog

I don't want a national carry law. I want a national "no permit necessary for anyone who's not a convicted felon" law. I carry at all times and have, reluctantly, a permit, but what other right enumerated in the Bill of Rights requires "permission"?


11 posted on 12/12/2006 1:41:19 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

I hope you mean as in ground in to the dirt by a stamped to elect a more conservative individual.


12 posted on 12/12/2006 1:52:37 PM PST by A Strict Constructionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist

Typo should be stampede.


13 posted on 12/12/2006 1:53:59 PM PST by A Strict Constructionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy

Here you go -

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491. Also see Marbury v. Madison, 1801.
 
"A county may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution." McGoldrick v. Bewind-White Co., 309 U.S. 33, 56- 58

All we need to do is persuade the Marxists in black robes to follow the constitution and precedence. Fat chance.......


14 posted on 12/12/2006 2:38:48 PM PST by sergeantdave (Consider that nearly half the people you pass on the street meet Lenin's definition of useful idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist
A stampede of citizens over them would be fine. Hopefully it would be after the tar and feathering.

(I've been accused of owning stock in the Acme Feather Company. That's not correct but I do have shares in US Tar and Asphalt Inc.)

15 posted on 12/12/2006 2:41:36 PM PST by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 9/12/01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wheelgun

Congratulations to the Ohio Senate and House. Thank God they have thinking people in the Ohio legislature; Goodbye Mr. Taft.


16 posted on 12/12/2006 2:54:36 PM PST by majormaturity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmett McCarthy

I agree 100% with your point. as long as you are not a convicted felon, nutcase, or drunk/doper you should have the right to be unencumbered by having to get "permission:" from your governmant to excercise your civil rights according to the Constitution.


17 posted on 12/12/2006 5:22:09 PM PST by riverdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Well you have the base under control. Now you can take care of the feather merchants.


18 posted on 12/12/2006 7:08:40 PM PST by A Strict Constructionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wheelgun

Wasn't a part of this bill new provisions concerning carrying in your car?
The existing law is/was idiotic.


19 posted on 12/12/2006 7:32:50 PM PST by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson