To: misterrob
"While Newt is not helping on this by using the terminology I can't see why anyone should be disagreeing with him."
There are too many people who equate criticism of our policy with embracing the Democrats. I supported the toppling of Saddam, as did most Americans, but I have never been all that enthusiastic with the Willsonian adventure in nation building. We should of focused more on setting up a secure government that would not harbor terrorists and then let the Iraquis decide for themselves if they wanted to make the transisition to a democratic form of government.
106 posted on
11/29/2006 10:53:32 AM PST by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: rob777
let the Iraquis decide for themselves if they wanted to make the transisition to a democratic form of government. They decided in three different elections when up to 12 million Iraqis braved life and limb to vote.
115 posted on
11/29/2006 11:02:06 AM PST by
kabar
To: rob777
How tiresome it is when people adopt ignorance as their own. This is NOT "nation building" Iraq is already a nation. This is no more "nation building" than the reconstruction of Japan and Germany were "nation building" after WWII.
What glib nonsense will we hear next?
136 posted on
11/29/2006 12:08:56 PM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: rob777
There are too many people who equate criticism of our policy with embracing the Democrats. I supported the toppling of Saddam, as did most Americans, but I have never been all that enthusiastic with the Willsonian adventure in nation building. We should of focused more on setting up a secure government that would not harbor terrorists and then let the Iraquis decide for themselves if they wanted to make the transisition to a democratic form of government. Well said.
158 posted on
11/29/2006 1:03:10 PM PST by
DungeonMaster
(Rudy 08...If ya can't beat em, join em.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson