1 posted on
11/24/2006 4:40:43 PM PST by
flixxx
To: flixxx
Sandra leaves the rarefied air of DC and gets her senses back. What other nonsensical decision should be revisited.
2 posted on
11/24/2006 5:08:24 PM PST by
Thebaddog
(Labrador Retrievers are the dog's dog)
To: flixxx
Boo frickin hoo. I can only hope this affects her in some personal way and will haunt her for the rest of her days.
3 posted on
11/24/2006 5:12:04 PM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: flixxx
Justice O'Connor says she isn't in the habit of revisiting her opinions on the bench, but it sounds as if she's making an exception for this one.
Sorry Sandy, once the SCOTUS rules it's as if God spoke. We're stuck with the decision for eternity no matter how wrong the decision was. Put your hand on your heart and keep repeating "Dred Scott,Roe V. Wade".
To: flixxx
That woman has been responsible for innumerable unconstitutional and just plain evil decisions. So now she's waking up? Sorry, it's too late.
7 posted on
11/24/2006 5:39:24 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: flixxx
Ugh, Ronald Reagan's biggest mistake is off flapping her gums again.
8 posted on
11/24/2006 5:40:32 PM PST by
jpl
(Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
To: flixxx
And this is the moron who screeches incessantly about an "independant" judiciary, ie. unaccountable. The wonder is how our country survived 20 years of O'Connor on the SCOTUS.
To: flixxx
A judicial John McCain...
Don't get between her and a camera.
15 posted on
11/25/2006 6:55:14 AM PST by
sayfer bullets
("....man's got to know his limitations" - Dirty Harry)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson