Thanks a lot, Dems, you want to kill everything........
To: Red Badger
_Tax breaks for refinery expansion and for geological studies to help oil exploration. Yeah, we definitely don't want anything that might reduce our dependance on terrorist oil.
To: Red Badger
When oil goes back to $3.00/gallon - will the MSM blame the dems on a daily basis?
3 posted on
11/22/2006 7:30:28 AM PST by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Red Badger
What they want higher gas prices and gas lines.
These people are all Carterites and beyond incompetent.
6 posted on
11/22/2006 7:32:45 AM PST by
NeoCaveman
(Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
To: Red Badger
But wait, I thought oil only needed the free market, and only EEEVILL ethanol gets tax breaks...
7 posted on
11/22/2006 7:35:27 AM PST by
hlmencken3
(Originalist on the the 'general welfare' clause? No? NOT an originalist!)
To: Red Badger
So.....are the "tax breaks" that're gonna get rolled back or "subsidies" that're gonna get rolled back?
I'm guessing tax breaks.
10 posted on
11/22/2006 7:38:29 AM PST by
ElectricStrawberry
(27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
To: Red Badger
Libs.. never met a tax break they didn't hate... never met a tax they din't like.
11 posted on
11/22/2006 7:40:55 AM PST by
Cinnamon
To: Red Badger
The government already makes twice as much off of a gallon of gas than the oil company does. Guess who pays at the pumps when the rats raise their taxes.
12 posted on
11/22/2006 7:40:57 AM PST by
Mogollon
To: Red Badger
better buy hybrid or diesel...
13 posted on
11/22/2006 7:41:56 AM PST by
100-Fold_Return
(I'll Never Be Broke Another Day in My Life!)
To: Red Badger
Need to attend 'Profit Margin 101'
Alternative fuel sources should not 'bank' on soy diesel and corn ethanol.
Another point that everyone is missing:
Severe Uranium Shortage by 2010
14 posted on
11/22/2006 7:43:00 AM PST by
griswold3
(I cried when I erased my tagline....)
To: Red Badger
Democrats seem to think that all refineries are owned by companies who drill for oil. In reality, integrated oil companies are becoming the exception and refineries are largely owned by companies not in the drilling business.
But to stupid Democrats, all oil companies are the same.
15 posted on
11/22/2006 7:54:35 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: Red Badger
This brings back memories of Carter and Commies.
Take away the tax breaks for the oil bidnesses, middle class, small business...
17 posted on
11/22/2006 8:01:11 AM PST by
Mrs. Shawnlaw
(No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
To: Red Badger
Dem's need to look at the example Senator Durbin pursued for personal recognition during his beginning political career.
Durbin initiated, at his Illinois home base, to bring charges for price gouging against big oil.
Both turned out to entirely clear oil companies.
The final result however came when Amoco, an independent oil and chemical company gave up, sold out to British Petroleum and disappeared from Durbin's home turf of Illinois.
Both, Oil and Chemical divisions departed from Durbins investigative zeal of gaining personal recognizance.
Along they wiped out from Illinois and Chicago very good paying jobs including a solid tax base.
Durbin sits as second in the Dem Senate and needs to inform his fellow lawmakers of his experience and consequences.
18 posted on
11/22/2006 8:06:02 AM PST by
hermgem
(The same)
To: Red Badger
Let's start looking at the tax exempt status of WINERIES....eh, Nancy....
19 posted on
11/22/2006 8:37:59 AM PST by
goodnesswins
(I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
To: Red Badger
Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in an outline of priorities over the first 100 hours of the next Congress in January, promises to begin a move toward greater energy independence "by rolling back the multibillion dollar subsidies for Big Oil." Incredibly stupid. If you want energy independence, you don't apply dis-incentives. What a jerk. Too bad she never worked a day in the private sector, can't read a P&L or balance sheet, doesn't understand business cycles,and doesn't understand economics.
There is no such concept as "windfall profits."
20 posted on
11/22/2006 8:57:43 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: Red Badger
The net profit to oil companies is 9.5%. About 1/2 to 1/3 of the banking or pharmaceutical companies. Also consider TAXES paid by consumers which is DOUBLE the profit margin of big EEEVIL oil. Dem arguments hold no water in logic, common sense or facts.
23 posted on
11/22/2006 9:03:49 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: Red Badger
But he suggested it will take time to produce legislation. "The process is a long one. It takes hearings, it takes fact finding," said Dingell in a telephone interview. That's all you need to know about the next Congress. The same thing will be said by all of the Democrat chairs. Lots of smoke, but no fire.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson