Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Take Aim at Oil Company Tax Breaks
www.forbes.com ^ | 11/21/2006 | H. JOSEF HEBERT

Posted on 11/22/2006 7:27:11 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Thanks a lot, Dems, you want to kill everything........
1 posted on 11/22/2006 7:27:14 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
_Tax breaks for refinery expansion and for geological studies to help oil exploration.

Yeah, we definitely don't want anything that might reduce our dependance on terrorist oil.

2 posted on 11/22/2006 7:29:53 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
When oil goes back to $3.00/gallon - will the MSM blame the dems on a daily basis?
3 posted on 11/22/2006 7:30:28 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

If I didn't know any better, I'd think this was written for Scrappleface.........


4 posted on 11/22/2006 7:30:57 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

No, Only Republicans get the "blame". Dems wil be hailed for "trying to hold the line"..........


5 posted on 11/22/2006 7:31:50 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
What they want higher gas prices and gas lines.

These people are all Carterites and beyond incompetent.
6 posted on 11/22/2006 7:32:45 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

But wait, I thought oil only needed the free market, and only EEEVILL ethanol gets tax breaks...


7 posted on 11/22/2006 7:35:27 AM PST by hlmencken3 (Originalist on the the 'general welfare' clause? No? NOT an originalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

In order for (D) to govern, there must be a continuing crisis of some sort. A boogeyman to shake in front of the electorate and say, "We will save you from him!" If they do exactly as they plan, they will either destroy the country's economy or themselves, or both.......


8 posted on 11/22/2006 7:36:30 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
If I didn't know any better, I'd think this was written for Scrappleface.........

Who needs Scrappleface when you have Pelosi?

9 posted on 11/22/2006 7:37:54 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So.....are the "tax breaks" that're gonna get rolled back or "subsidies" that're gonna get rolled back?

I'm guessing tax breaks.


10 posted on 11/22/2006 7:38:29 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Libs.. never met a tax break they didn't hate... never met a tax they din't like.


11 posted on 11/22/2006 7:40:55 AM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The government already makes twice as much off of a gallon of gas than the oil company does. Guess who pays at the pumps when the rats raise their taxes.


12 posted on 11/22/2006 7:40:57 AM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
better buy hybrid or diesel...
13 posted on 11/22/2006 7:41:56 AM PST by 100-Fold_Return (I'll Never Be Broke Another Day in My Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Need to attend 'Profit Margin 101'
Alternative fuel sources should not 'bank' on soy diesel and corn ethanol.
Another point that everyone is missing:
Severe Uranium Shortage by 2010


14 posted on 11/22/2006 7:43:00 AM PST by griswold3 (I cried when I erased my tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Democrats seem to think that all refineries are owned by companies who drill for oil. In reality, integrated oil companies are becoming the exception and refineries are largely owned by companies not in the drilling business.

But to stupid Democrats, all oil companies are the same.


15 posted on 11/22/2006 7:54:35 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Bumper Sticker Alert!


16 posted on 11/22/2006 8:00:06 AM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This brings back memories of Carter and Commies.
Take away the tax breaks for the oil bidnesses, middle class, small business...


17 posted on 11/22/2006 8:01:11 AM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Dem's need to look at the example Senator Durbin pursued for personal recognition during his beginning political career.
Durbin initiated, at his Illinois home base, to bring charges for price gouging against big oil.
Both turned out to entirely clear oil companies.
The final result however came when Amoco, an independent oil and chemical company gave up, sold out to British Petroleum and disappeared from Durbin's home turf of Illinois.
Both, Oil and Chemical divisions departed from Durbins investigative zeal of gaining personal recognizance.
Along they wiped out from Illinois and Chicago very good paying jobs including a solid tax base.
Durbin sits as second in the Dem Senate and needs to inform his fellow lawmakers of his experience and consequences.
18 posted on 11/22/2006 8:06:02 AM PST by hermgem (The same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Let's start looking at the tax exempt status of WINERIES....eh, Nancy....


19 posted on 11/22/2006 8:37:59 AM PST by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in an outline of priorities over the first 100 hours of the next Congress in January, promises to begin a move toward greater energy independence "by rolling back the multibillion dollar subsidies for Big Oil."

Incredibly stupid. If you want energy independence, you don't apply dis-incentives. What a jerk. Too bad she never worked a day in the private sector, can't read a P&L or balance sheet, doesn't understand business cycles,and doesn't understand economics.

There is no such concept as "windfall profits."

20 posted on 11/22/2006 8:57:43 AM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson