Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
"Neandertal was a speaking species."

I never surmised that Neanderthals were not a speaking species, but I am willing to use that contention, however ill-founded, as an allegorical explanation for their inability to compete successfully, and eventually triumph.

Something in their genetic makeup, or social construction, operated against them whether it was speech, memory, or even olfactory insufficiencies (of either type).

Or maybe the Main Stream was just against them.

49 posted on 11/08/2006 11:51:49 AM PST by NicknamedBob (If the Supreme Court has "Judges for Life," why is there any question about Roe vs Wade?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: NicknamedBob
I never surmised that Neanderthals were not a speaking species, but I am willing to use that contention, however ill-founded, as an allegorical explanation for their inability to compete successfully, and eventually triumph.
Ah, allegory. Here's the quote from your earlier post:
It may well be that a superior brain size of Neanderthals conferred little advantage because they were stymied by an inability to articulate an advanced language well. Only when a gene for advanced brain size got somehow correlated with other genes for brain complexity, and language skills and vocal structures could societal skills be properly passed on to the next generations.
Since the evidence is that Neandertal is ancestral to part of the Earth's population, it is pointless to speculate on reasons for their extinction.
50 posted on 11/08/2006 11:59:03 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Dhimmicrati delenda est! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson