Interesting strategery........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Erik Latranyi
To: Erik Latranyi
No - it will only hurt Lieberman's chances, as some of his Democrat support will go back to Lomant.
To: Erik Latranyi
4 posted on
11/03/2006 4:13:44 AM PST by
NapkinUser
(Why isn't there a 'virtual fence' around the White House?)
To: Erik Latranyi
In that case may I be the first to say, Welcome home, Joe. I wonder if he will bring the Jewish vote with him.
5 posted on
11/03/2006 4:13:58 AM PST by
cloud8
To: Erik Latranyi
Lieberman remains a far-left radical extremist. He has voted for liberal issues 95 per cent of the time in Congress.
He votes farther to the left than Teddy Kennedy. He is dedicated to a socialist America.
This is the man President Bush praises. No wonder Bush has lost so much of his conservative base.
To: Erik Latranyi
I hope the Pubbies don't count their rodents too soon. Lieberman also said he wouldn't help Algore to to disenfranchise military voters.
But what I really want to know is happened to that bull that was running around Newark, NJ?
12 posted on
11/03/2006 4:15:34 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Erik Latranyi
I seriously doubt it.
And it would be foolish to make it known now, as it would hurt his chances in Connecticut.
(Sounds like a Lamont "dirty trick".)
To: Erik Latranyi
Anyone who thinks Lieberman will caucus with the Republicans are kidding themselves. Joe will drop this whole 'independent' farce and be back with the party within six months, mark my words. Less, if the Democrats take the Senate.
To: Erik Latranyi
Who's their source for this .. A democrat ?
16 posted on
11/03/2006 4:16:08 AM PST by
Mo1
(Senator Kerry's response to the military ~ Let me make this is crystal clear, I apologize to no one)
To: Erik Latranyi
Did Joe really say so? I don't think he will be. If he plans, I don't think he'd say it now. This may be Dims' strategy to boost Lamont.
17 posted on
11/03/2006 4:16:18 AM PST by
paudio
(Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
To: Erik Latranyi
I am having some difficulty believing this. He is going to appear on Imus this morning. Perhaps something will be said about this.
20 posted on
11/03/2006 4:16:59 AM PST by
Bahbah
(Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
To: Erik Latranyi
Lamont appears in the stupidest campaign ad I have ever seen.
It features a fat actor with an enormous white wig who drives a Lincoln Town Car into a series of brick walls grafittoed with "Iraq War" and "Social Security Privatization" and "No Child Left Behind." Each time the actor gets out and says stuff like "How'd that get there?" and "Didin't see that one coming!"
Ned Lamont walks into the frame and says that Liberman is too clueless to be Senator.
It is the worst ad in terms of effectiveness I've ever seen.
The Lamontbats have lost it.
21 posted on
11/03/2006 4:17:06 AM PST by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: Erik Latranyi
Get elected, Joe. Then change parties.
You're obviously a man of integrity. There's no place for such a man in the 21st-century Democrat Party. Get out. Then explain these facts of life to the remaining decent Democrat supporters who are still in denial.
23 posted on
11/03/2006 4:17:40 AM PST by
Savage Beast
("We can either fight the Democrats at the polls or...fight terrorists in our streets." ~jmaroneps37)
To: Erik Latranyi
24 posted on
11/03/2006 4:17:45 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Erik Latranyi
Fox & Friends should STFU if this is true.
But I doubt it is. Lieberman is a committed Third Way socialist. He is merely clear-headed on the topic of Islamic fascism.
To: Erik Latranyi
Lie-berman will caucus with whoever gives him the best offer.
30 posted on
11/03/2006 4:23:21 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Erik Latranyi
Does this mean I need to stop calling him Loserman?
To: Erik Latranyi
Fox & Friends (Lieberman may caucus with the GOP)
Don't count on it. Lieberman is still a registered Democrat. he publicly stated two weeks ago he hopes the Democrats take control fo Congress. The Democrats are donatin money to his campaign.
Lamont Gets Little From Senate Dems
"Lieberman, a three-term incumbent, is highly regarded in Washington circles, and his campaign finance report showed his Democratic donor base remains eager to give him money."
The Democrats still have strong ties with him. In the same article:
"Democrats know they can't afford to alienate Lieberman," said political analyst Jennifer Duffy, not only because they want his cooperation on legislation if he wins, but because of the potential that Democrats will win Senate control next month by a 51-49 majority."
Lieberman is trying to hoodwink the RINO's in Connecticut and they are falling for it hook, line and sinker. A vote for Lieberman is a vote for the RATS who we all know would be a disaster for our national security.
33 posted on
11/03/2006 4:27:02 AM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: Erik Latranyi
Do they have any reason to believe that this is true, or they just talking out of their... collective ignorance... again?
35 posted on
11/03/2006 4:30:10 AM PST by
gridlock
(The GOP will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: Erik Latranyi
That rumor may very well have originated with Lamont's campaign. Lieberman has a double digit lead in most polls, so the Democrats are telling voters that Lieberman will push the GOP agenda.
40 posted on
11/03/2006 4:34:15 AM PST by
bobjam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson