Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All seafood will run out in 2050, say scientists [Run for your lives.]
The Telegraph (Britain) ^ | 03NOV06 | Charles Clover, Environment Editor

Posted on 11/03/2006 2:34:31 AM PST by familyop

The world's stocks of seafood will have collapsed by 2050 at present rates of destruction by fishing, scientists said yesterday.

A four-year study of 7,800 marine species around the world's ecosystems has concluded that the long-term trend is clear and predictable.

 
A catch of fish
If the rate of over-fishing continues, the world's currently fished seafoods will have reached what is defined as collapse by 2048

By 2048, to be exact, catches of all the presently fished seafoods will have declined on average by more than 90 per cent since 1950.

The study, by an international group of ecologists and economists, says the loss of biodiversity impairs the ability of oceans to feed the world's growing human population — expected to rise by 50 per cent to nine billion in 2050.

Over-fishing also sabotages the stability of marine environments, profoundly reducing the ocean's ability to produce seafood, resist diseases, filter pollutants and rebound from stresses such as climate change.

Every species matters when it comes to the ocean's ability to repair itself, says the study, published in this week's Science magazine.

Dr Boris Worm, of Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, the lead author, said: "This is what is projected, not predicted, to happen. I am confident we will not go there because we will do something about it. But if this trend continues in this predictable fashion, as it has for the last 50 years, the world's currently fished seafoods will have reached what we define as collapse by 2048.

"Every year a higher percentage of the currently fished stocks has collapsed. We are losing it piece by piece."

Prof Callum Roberts, of the University of York, who was not involved in the study, said: "The animals and plants that inhabit the sea are not merely embellishments to be wondered at. They are essential to the health of the oceans and well-being of human society."

The scientists found that in 12 regions, which include the Wadden Sea, the shallow part of the North Sea, 38 per cent of exploited marine species of all kinds, including birds, had collapsed in the past 1,000 years while seven per cent was extinct. Some 29 per cent had collapsed since 1950.

 
Loss of species graph

Dr Worm said the decline of cod on the Scotian shelf, off Canada, had led to changes throughout the ecosystem. But there was some good news in the paper.

Dr Worm said there was evidence that wherever protective measures were taken, species recovered rapidly and could cope better with problems such as global warming.

The catch per unit of effort — the standard scientific way of measuring fishing activity — goes up four-fold.

As wild fish stocks decline, farmed fish is expected to take over. Some 43 per cent of fish consumed is already farmed, says the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation.

But it warned that fish farming would struggle to maintain even present levels of production because the small wild fish that are fed to farmed species are being over-fished.

Willie Mackenzie, of Greenpeace, said: "This report confirms the scale of the crisis our oceans are facing. It's clear that fish and chips will be off the menu within our lifetimes if we don't act now.

"We need to ban destructive fishing practices and create a network of large-scale marine reserves around not just Britain, but globally".

Despite the problem of the oceans being on a time-scale comparable to global warming, the Government appears to have scrapped plans to introduce its promised Marine Bill in the Queen's Speech this month, the environmental group WWF said yesterday.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Political Humor/Cartoons; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: global; seefood; theskyisfalling; warming; wereallgonnadie; worm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: familyop
This is why those prepared for economic oceanic decline are investing in goldfish and silverfish. Some experts expect values to quintuple in the coming year.


61 posted on 11/03/2006 4:43:24 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Hey Kerry, What part of showing heels and ass is a winning strategy in Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian

jelly fish are great in peanut butter sandwiches!


62 posted on 11/03/2006 4:45:14 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: familyop
My sea food doesn't come from the sea. It comes from The Lobster Hut.
63 posted on 11/03/2006 4:54:37 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Did you really tell the poor fishes to run for their lives, because of this here story of Dr. Worm ?

There's a hook !


64 posted on 11/03/2006 4:56:18 AM PST by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Over-fishing also sabotages the stability of marine environments, profoundly reducing the ocean's ability to produce seafood

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Why fish in the ocean when there's plenty of fish in the reservoir?

Note: Photograph altered to meet the standards of FR Church Lady moderators. (:^D)

65 posted on 11/03/2006 4:59:50 AM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack
When I was a child, my father would cast a shrimp net into the salty waters, empty it into the boat, and the bottom of the boat would be covered with jumping shrimp. Today, you consider yourself lucky if you get two or three in your net.

If environmentalists, environmentalist charities, and those inclined to give money and other resources to them want to do something worthwhile, they will stop harrassing property owners; stop supporting the Left; stop empowering Leftist morons, sociopaths, power-hungry bullies, and brainless burocrats and mindless "environmentalists" (who LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE the ENVIRONNNNMENNNNNNT but are too stupid to do anything but gaze into space and give their support to Leftist sociopaths, bullies, and morons); and channel resources into realistic strategies--especially research--holding promise of causing valuable sea life to fluorish.

My wife and I are ex-"environmentalists".

We are vegetarians. We do not allow hunting or fishing on our property. We recycle regularly. We take extraordinary measures to protect the natural environment. This is a major consideration for us at all times.

We FORMERLY supported the "Environmentalist Movement". That was before we found out who was running it and what their harebrained and/or nefarious intentions are.

I am now an anti-"Environmentalist".

This is my rule of thumb:

If the "Environmentalists" are for it, oppose it. If they're against it, support it.

66 posted on 11/03/2006 5:12:47 AM PST by Savage Beast ("We can either fight the Democrats at the polls or...fight terrorists in our streets." ~jmaroneps37)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaDuce; familyop
My name is Dr. Worm.
Good morning. How are you? I'm Dr. Worm.
I'm interested in things.
I'm not a real doctor,
But I am a real worm;
I am an actual worm.
I live like a worm.

~They Might Be Giants, Dr. Worm

67 posted on 11/03/2006 5:17:21 AM PST by jboot (Faith is not a work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Damn, I'm gonna miss stuffed crab. Wait a minute-2050 you say? Never mind, I'll be dead by then.


68 posted on 11/03/2006 5:17:38 AM PST by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Betcha they had to carry that haddock off on a gurnard.


69 posted on 11/03/2006 5:28:17 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: camle
you mean we won't get SCROD anymore?

If the democrats win any majorities in November we will be really and truly scrod.

70 posted on 11/03/2006 5:45:04 AM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: familyop
What I'm really looking for is the headline that says,

" THE WORLD WILL RUN OUT OF CRACKPOT SCIENTISTS BY THE YEAR 2025 --ACADEMIA HIT HARDEST!"

71 posted on 11/03/2006 5:47:18 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
I hate to agree with enviro-fascist-whackos, but in this case I do.
We don't hunt for meat, we ranch it. If did hunt for meat, our methods are so efficient that there would quickly be no critters left to hunt.
Same should be true for the oceans. Our fishing methods are too efficient - we're wiping out the stocks. We should ranch our fish; fresh wild seafood should be a sport or luxury item and cost accordingly.
72 posted on 11/03/2006 5:48:37 AM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

LOL!


73 posted on 11/03/2006 5:49:26 AM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: camle

No but we've lost our soles only to flounder hopelessly.

It's a quagmire I tell you!


74 posted on 11/03/2006 5:52:24 AM PST by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

whenmever I thnk of democrats, I don't think quagmire - I think morass!


75 posted on 11/03/2006 5:58:14 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack

Umm correct me if I am wrong. But won't global warming cause the sea levels to rise? If this happens wouldn't we have more habitat for the little fishies?

So to avert the upcoming NO FISH tragedy should we burn more fossil fuels and go back to aerosol sprays? Guess so.


76 posted on 11/03/2006 6:06:03 AM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Ok.


77 posted on 11/03/2006 6:08:18 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: familyop

All of it, huh? Are they giving out science degrees with a fill-up of petrol these days?


78 posted on 11/03/2006 6:19:14 AM PST by nitejohnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I found a perch
To sit my bass
Then found a worm
In the grass

I'd pick it up
If I cod
But then I heard
The voice of God

He wore a Badge
It said DNR
He said you can't
Possess that gar

It's a bass, you ass
I tried to explain
Its fins and scales
Make that plain

So he wrote a ticket
For holding a gar
Then drove in the lake
While in his car

Save me!
I'll make you rich
I said I haddock
You son...


(I better quit here)


79 posted on 11/03/2006 6:37:22 AM PST by sergeantdave (Consider that nearly half the people you pass on the street meet Lenin's definition of useful idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Time to hit the buffet at Red Lobster!


80 posted on 11/03/2006 6:41:04 AM PST by pierrem15 (Charles Martel: past and future of France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson