Skip to comments.
Charles Schumer Confident Democrats Will Win Senate
NewsMax ^
| 10/29/06
| AP
Posted on 10/29/2006 11:04:24 AM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
"We're right on the edge. Every week things get better and better," said Sen. Charles Schumer Hey Chuckie, the polls say something totally different!
1
posted on
10/29/2006 11:04:26 AM PST
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
2
posted on
10/29/2006 11:11:17 AM PST
by
bitt
("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.")
To: wagglebee
Darkwolf Confident No One Here Cares What Schumer Thinks
3
posted on
10/29/2006 11:17:23 AM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Republican, atheist, pro-life)
To: wagglebee
Hey Chuckie,
Just keep it up and maybe Al Quaida will be so grateful, they'll behead you last.
4
posted on
10/29/2006 11:18:31 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: wagglebee
If it's in the bag, then the 'rats can just stay home on the 7th.
5
posted on
10/29/2006 11:18:46 AM PST
by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: wagglebee
To: wagglebee
There is little more repulsive in this world to witness than a confident Chuckie Shumer.
To: wagglebee
Wasn't he confident going into the rats' 2004 landslide loss, too? Doesn't mean a thing.
To: John Lenin
9
posted on
10/29/2006 11:23:40 AM PST
by
ChurtleDawg
(Go Mike Steele!)
To: wagglebee
Also, if Steele wins, CS could be more easily investigated for snooping on Americans.
10
posted on
10/29/2006 11:26:54 AM PST
by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: wagglebee
....Does he want to put money on this?
11
posted on
10/29/2006 11:29:30 AM PST
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: Tzimisce
Yeah, and I'm cofident that Chucky will some day wind up in prison.
12
posted on
10/29/2006 11:36:21 AM PST
by
kjo
I call it 'more and more a referrendum on progress, and a new direction toward the same old tax increases we've all come to expect from a spend happy democratic party' Gee chuck- let's do hope the dems take the house- this country has experienced gain for far too long now- time to roll back the clocks and get this country right back to where we were under Carter- deep depression!
Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...
13
posted on
10/29/2006 11:42:50 AM PST
by
CottShop
(http://sacredscoop.com)
To: Paladin2
Also, if Steele wins, CS could be more easily investigated for snooping on Americans. From your keyboard to God's ear!
14
posted on
10/29/2006 11:44:36 AM PST
by
tiredoflaundry
( The kinder we are to terrorists, the harsher we are to their potential victims.)
To: wagglebee
I dont believe anything they say anymore.
Now if Chucky had put some of his personal money on the table to back up this gust of global warming I might put some credence in this. But, since he didnt - it is nothing more than an attempt to create some news buzz.
15
posted on
10/29/2006 11:44:42 AM PST
by
Nip
(SPECTRE - taking out the enemy one terrorist at a time; at night; without warning or mercy)
To: wagglebee
Saw another thread where the claim was being made that Lieberman would help the GOP retain control of the Senate.
If Lieberman is the only thing that stands in the way of the Dems controlling the Senate, then the Dems control the Senate.
To: wagglebee
You know, at this point, I want the Republicans to win for no other reason that we could go in those BIG MOUTH Libs face and say, Na na na na na. Ha ha we won...you lost...You thought you were going to win, but you lost...HAHAHAHAHAHAH.
I'm watching last night's SNL, and I swear it's a DNC commercial...they are so sure they're going to win. And not only win, but win by a landslide....It makes me so freaking angry.....I hope every Republican is as angry as I am.
17
posted on
10/29/2006 11:45:47 AM PST
by
Hildy
(Some are born to sweet delight; some are born to endless night.)
To: wagglebee
Would you expect this turd-belching LIBRAT to say anything else?
18
posted on
10/29/2006 11:46:38 AM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If a pug barks and no one is around to hear it... they hold a grudge for a long time!)
To: Tzimisce
I'll bet they're kinda mad that they got trapped into going after Foley. I'm sure they were saving it for when hillary was running. But Studds was gonna die. It would be all over the news.
The Foley bit put the kabash on saying "bad things about the dead"....so Studds passed with hardly a notice of his "immorality" as related to his "doing a Page" by this blatant homosexual.
The Dems then decided to "backlash" Hastert and Reynolds. Very Rovian.....except Hastert and Reynolds ARE NOT Dems. They are outstanding leaders.
Hillary never said BOO......But she has now come out for homosexual marriage and the NY Dems are pushing for it. She has to conform...at least temporarily.
The problem is that Bubba signed the Marriage Protection Act AND "Don't Ask, Don't tell" policies. For every gay vote she picked up, she lost 10.
19
posted on
10/29/2006 11:47:28 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Hildy
The Dem's always seem to forget about "voter apathy". They keep harping that they will win. Many on their side will find it easier to make the excuse " we are going to win anyway, so they do not need my vote".
20
posted on
10/29/2006 11:49:13 AM PST
by
tiredoflaundry
( The kinder we are to terrorists, the harsher we are to their potential victims.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson