I love these so-called "studies" that are done, and trotted out to the masses as serious stuff. Note they never tell how the "studies" were done, nor do they include the data sets, the controls, the variables, you name it. They think by merely saying "studies were done" it somehow bears weight and import. BLEAH!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: flyingtabby
All of those doing this study should depart the planet or stop eating and drinking.
2 posted on
10/24/2006 7:16:03 PM PDT by
shankbear
(Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
To: flyingtabby
Well, common sense tells you that there is only so much land for vegetation and raising cows. At some point we will reach saturation.
3 posted on
10/24/2006 7:16:10 PM PDT by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: flyingtabby
This is bullshit. Nevertheless, perhaps the "true believers" (the author and the source of this 'study') could do the noble thing and help mankind by sucking the barrel of a pistol until they hear a bang?
4 posted on
10/24/2006 7:16:16 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: flyingtabby
Well, it seems like the simple answer is just to eject the Muslims from the planet. That'll take care of all the excessive consumption in the middle east, plus free up a tremendous amount of space for the rest of us to use.
What? Not permitted. Aww, come on, why not? Oh, right, Americans are evil. Damn. Why do I keep forgetting that. Fine. Everyone in America: stop buying anything from outside the United States. Let's save the planet everyone! Show the world how to consume only what you produce...
5 posted on
10/24/2006 7:16:38 PM PDT by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: flyingtabby
Extreme Enviromentalism is a backdoor to Socialism.
6 posted on
10/24/2006 7:16:43 PM PDT by
Thunder90
To: flyingtabby
WWF ... What would wrestlers know about world resources ???
7 posted on
10/24/2006 7:17:02 PM PDT by
clamper1797
(It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win)
To: flyingtabby
Sorry....I know they changed it for legal reasons, but whenever I see WWF, I still think wrestling. Somehow, I just don't this guy saying, "Whatch gonna do when eco-disasters run wild on you, brother?"
9 posted on
10/24/2006 7:18:25 PM PDT by
edpc
(Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
To: flyingtabby
This is only true in those places around the globe where farming can't sustain their populous.
Blame Africa.
To: flyingtabby
So called "experts" doing studies because they could not make it in the private sector. I wouldn't trust these individuals as far as I could throw the Chrysler Building.
12 posted on
10/24/2006 7:20:06 PM PDT by
xc1427
(Remember, it's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.)
To: flyingtabby
"Humans living far beyond planet's means: WWF"
Ha! Now even professional wrestlers are on the enviro-whacko bandwagon! I told you all that it was nothing but a circus!
13 posted on
10/24/2006 7:20:20 PM PDT by
familyop
(Run for your lives!)
To: flyingtabby
We should live in tee-pee's and eat sorgham all day. And millet. Our clothes should be made out of twigs.
14 posted on
10/24/2006 7:20:41 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: flyingtabby
Humans are stripping nature at an unprecedented rate and will need two planets' worth of natural resources every year by 2050 I notice this psychotic stooge was yammering in Peking. He should stay there. The Chinese deserve him.
To: flyingtabby
Pure, utter Bull$h!T !!!!!
17 posted on
10/24/2006 7:27:44 PM PDT by
knarf
(Islamists kill each other ... News wall-to-wall, 24/7 .. don't touch that dial.)
To: flyingtabby
According to "studies" done by these mental giants, the world has ended several times already. Now, it's 2050? Nuts!!
To: flyingtabby
I read the first sentence and thought this was Scrappleface or The Onion. No need to read further.
To: flyingtabby
Of all organizations, the WWF should know that no species can live beyond the carrying capacity of its habitat and when a population reaches that carrying capacity, nature will enforce a rise in mortality rates to drive the numbers downward. The human population may experience some really bad times as it approaches the limits on its resources but I trust natural controls over socialistic controls. Nature discriminates only on the basis of each individual's survivability. A socialist government sees individual strength as something to be dispensed with.
To: flyingtabby
As soon as rich liberals stop using limousines and private jets I will sell my pinball machines, buy a prius and live in a commune.
To: flyingtabby
Sure, and the mass famines Malthus predicted wiped out millions, and we ran out of gold in 1981 and mercury in 1985 and lead and copper in 1993 and usable land in 2000 just like the Club of Rome predicted.
I still haven't figured out what percentage of the left are crooks and charlatans and what percentage of them are good-hearted folk who don't understand economics at all.
29 posted on
10/24/2006 7:38:18 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: flyingtabby
Isn't the WWF like anti-human or something? Somewhat akin to Greenpeace, Siera Club, etc. etc.
32 posted on
10/24/2006 7:40:43 PM PDT by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: flyingtabby
There will always be plenty of cute animals to eat.
33 posted on
10/24/2006 7:41:23 PM PDT by
Buck W.
(If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson