To: MOgirl
Do you think, realistically, the average voter is all that passionate about stem cell research, anyway? I don't know why the dems seem to think it's such a winning issue right now.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Because they've decided to use it to tie into abortion, but to be sneaky snakes about it.
80 posted on
10/24/2006 3:16:33 PM PDT by
Fudd Fan
(Some pray for peace; I pray for the VICTORY that will ensure it.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
What I'm confused about is why Liberals want people to suffer from Malaria and such when DDT could pretty much cure all that too.....
84 posted on
10/24/2006 3:18:31 PM PDT by
Terriergal
(All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I hope the average voter does not pay attention to it, because GOVERNMENT HAS NO PLACE in research. NONE!
GOVERNMENT MAKES EVERYTHING WORSE!
Puleese.
Values voter, puke.
There is no bottom to low for these idiots.
Now if Embryonic Stem Cells could cure Liberalism, I might be persuaded to rethink the issue. /s
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Hello,
Here in SW St. Louis Co, the yard signs are easily 8 to 1 against this amendment, for what it is worth. I do see more McCaskill signs than Talent signs, but more anti Prop 2 (really a cloning amendment, not a stem cell amendment) signs than anything. I can't imagine someone that is against the Prop 2 amendment voting for McCaskill. To answer your question more specifically, this issue is huge here, as this is a proposed change to our state constitution. If passed, the voters of MO will have NO voice in the issue going forward. The shameless tactics of those pushing this are using the pain and suffering of victims of diseases to tug at our heartstrings. Bastards.
Glad to be here, MOgirl
168 posted on
10/24/2006 3:52:52 PM PDT by
MOgirl
(Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson