Skip to comments.
The GOP Must Give Voters a Clear Choice
Human Events Online ^
| 10/16/2001
| Newt Gingrich
Posted on 10/17/2006 10:01:31 AM PDT by unspun
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Best advise I've seen, about this election.
1
posted on
10/17/2006 10:01:34 AM PDT
by
unspun
To: unspun
Same. He forgets another extremely important point, however - appointing conservative judges who uphold only the law, as opposed to Clinton-like judges who will let the Lynn Stewarts of the country off easy.
2
posted on
10/17/2006 10:08:03 AM PDT
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: unspun
3
posted on
10/17/2006 10:09:38 AM PDT
by
petercooper
(Polls Schmolls.)
To: unspun
Why aren't you working for the RNC, writing their political campaign ads?
4
posted on
10/17/2006 10:09:50 AM PDT
by
raftguide
To: cinives
NG says the base is depressed and Republicans are gloomy? I am getting the opposite feeling from comments here on FR. People out in the field say they are finding their voters are fired up. I hope the latter is correct.
5
posted on
10/17/2006 10:12:26 AM PDT
by
TNCMAXQ
To: unspun
Everyone should read it. Gingrich is going to make things very interesting in 08.
6
posted on
10/17/2006 10:13:24 AM PDT
by
duckln
To: unspun
He is right. Especially on the economic issues.
7
posted on
10/17/2006 10:16:34 AM PDT
by
hawkaw
To: unspun
Wow....telling that given the title, he fails to mention anything about illegal immigration or border security. Quite telling.
8
posted on
10/17/2006 10:19:08 AM PDT
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08)
To: unspun
Once again, Newt hits it out of the park! Good find and post.
9
posted on
10/17/2006 10:27:37 AM PDT
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: cinives
He forgot a very crucial, important concern - AMNESTY. By the GOP ignoring the fact that many voters don't want AMNESTY for illegals they are taking a big risk.
To: unspun
Republicans need to take a united stand against earmarks.
11
posted on
10/17/2006 10:48:59 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
(then I understood their final destiny -- Psalm 73:17b)
To: DrewsDad
Republicans need to take a united stand against earmarks.
They're united all right, except they're ALL FOR them, in excess.
12
posted on
10/17/2006 10:51:46 AM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(DeWine ranked as one of the ten worst border security politicians - Human Events)
To: Kimberly GG
telling that given the title, he fails to mention anything about illegal immigration or border security. Quite telling. I noticed that, too!
13
posted on
10/17/2006 10:56:50 AM PDT
by
Netizen
To: unspun
"Their coverage has not been this biased against Republicans in three decades."
Oh, yes it has. Someday we'll look back to the election cycle of 2004 as the time the DBM decided to drop all pretense of objectivity and drumbeat for one party against another.
It really hasn't subsided since 2004, but it started in earnest then.
14
posted on
10/17/2006 10:58:14 AM PDT
by
Stand W
(Confusion to our enemies)
To: harveyrabbit
"He forgot a very crucial, important concern - AMNESTY. By the GOP ignoring the fact that many voters don't want AMNESTY for illegals they are taking a big risk."
Other than Reagan, who in the GOP is proposing amnesty?
None have.
15
posted on
10/17/2006 11:04:09 AM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Demonrats want the Gays out of Congress.....stand back and let them purge their base.)
To: harveyrabbit
He forgot a very crucial, important concern - AMNESTY. By the GOP ignoring the fact that many voters don't want AMNESTY for illegals they are taking a big risk. It's amazing how few Republicans are speaking about being committed to enforcing immigration laws and funding the INS and border security.
16
posted on
10/17/2006 11:09:49 AM PDT
by
Netizen
To: unspun
Republicans should advocate an energy strategy to include renewable fuels, bio-fuels, new approaches to clean coal, and safe nuclear energy consistent with scientifically sound conservation principles. All of these approaches are doable in a time of dramatic scientific change. Iowa Congressman Jim Nussle's IOWA Act (Independence from Oil With Agriculture) would dramatically expand the use of renewable fuels. The American people would rather support America's farmers than pay dictators in Iran or Venezuela for their fuel.
One thing missing. How about supporting AMERICA'S Oil Patch???
17
posted on
10/17/2006 11:36:07 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: unspun
To: TNCMAXQ
19
posted on
10/17/2006 12:03:46 PM PDT
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: Kimberly GG; cinives
Strict constructionist judges and border security bump.
Those issues are top-drawer critical, though they do "play better" in some districts, than others, I guess.
20
posted on
10/17/2006 12:06:54 PM PDT
by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson