Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Abraham Lincoln would have thrown CAIR under the train. Do your Congressmen or Senators support this subversive organization? If so, don’t vote for them.

VOTE REPUBLICAN IF YOU WANT FREEDOM FROM TERRORISM

1 posted on 10/15/2006 10:26:24 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yoe

"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith,
but to become dominant. The Qur'an should be the highest authority in America,
and Islam the only accepted religion on earth
"

--Omar Ahmed, Chairman of the Board of CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations), San Ramon Valley Herald, July 1998


Qur’an 8:12 “I shall terrorize the infidels.
So wound their bodies and incapacitate them
because they oppose Allah and His Apostle.”

Qur’an 8:57 “If you gain mastery over them in battle,
inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them,
so that they would learn a lesson and be warned.”





2 posted on 10/15/2006 10:31:47 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

The people of Minneapolis are leftist brainwashed Democrats. They will vote this traitor to congress.


3 posted on 10/15/2006 10:43:40 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (How to win over terrorist? KILL them with UNKINDNESS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Yoe - Trying to get the Minneapolis RED Star Tribune acknowledge his terrorist backing is like trying to get the NY Times to recognize that Bush is not Hitler reincarnated - they just won't hear it!

The only thing the socialist rag Minneapolis RED Star Tribune is interested in is digging up dirt on Ellison's Repubican opponent:

Minneapolis Paper Under Fire for Printing GOP House Candidate's Expunged Arrest Record

Posted by Matthew Sheffield

October 12, 2006 - 14:48

http://newsbusters.org/node/8286

Ted Kennedy can get away with leaving a campaign staffer to die in his car in the eyes of the media, but apparently a disputed and expunged arrest record of a Republican congressional candidate is worth blasting to the public. At least according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Scott Johnson at Power Line has the details:

I find Sunday's Star Tribune story by Paul McEnroe and Rochelle Olson on the expunged 1995 arrest of Republican Fifth District congressional candidate Alan Fine to be reprehensible. We posted the rationale offered by Star Tribune "reader's representative" Kate Parry for the Star Tribune's publication of the story here. Parry conteded that the story had "news value" because "Fine was arrested by the police, charged with domestic assault and spent a few hours in jail" and that "the allegations raised in the court documents were corroborated by the ex-wife in interviews with Star Tribune reporters." Parry did not mention or comment on the expungement of the arrest.

At the Star Tribune's online site, editor Anders Gyllenhaal has also offered his rationale for the publication of the story. Anyone who suspects that the Star Tribune offices are something of an echo chamber won't be disabused of the notion by Gyllenhaal's comments:

Several elements contributed to the decision to run the story: The officers who answered the domestic call decided to pursue the arrest and sent Fine to jail; the candidate’s former wife told reporters last week that the assault occurred even though she ended up withdrawing the charge; Fine’s former father-in-law, a local judge, backed up his daughter and said he’d been told of other instances of domestic abuse.

Gyllenhaal concludes by asserting that Fine's 1995 arrest and domestic dispute is part of its "full portrait" of Fine. Like Parry, Gyllenhaal omits any mention of the fact that Fine's arrest was expunged and, like McEnroe and Olson, Gyllenhaal fails to reveal whether the Star Tribune's source for the document obtained or released it legally to the Star Tribune.

It is difficult to overstate the vacuity of Parry's and Gyllenhaal's comments. Alan Fine was arrested in 1995 based on his wife's charge. His wife repeated the charge in 2006. Also in 2006, the ex-wife's father "backed up his daughter" -- i.e., repeats what his daughter allegedly told him in 1995. Despite all the huffing and puffing, the Star Tribune's story rests on the word of Alan Fine's wife.

4 posted on 10/15/2006 1:40:29 PM PDT by clifcrds (There Are None So Blind Than Those Who Will Not See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe; All

Ironically, after I read this, I googled the Star, a paper I subscribed to until 1981 when I left Minneapolis. I ended up reading a discussion of Islam at their forum. Came out with two great terms, thanks to one of the posters: Islamophile and factophobe. :)


5 posted on 10/15/2006 8:23:31 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson