Was his name Armitage?
Finally someone with a pair.
If not, perhaps you should apologize and stop posting this kind of stoopid commentary...........
ping
Newt Gingrich started this way.
You seem pretty upset that perhaps no more GOP members will fall. I can't recall you ever not being on the attack here against one GOP member or another. Quite a pattern.
Was his name Armitage?
It would probably be helpful for you to actually read the emails. Those are what Hastert and Co. say they saw last year. Then, when you realize they (the emails) were basically innoculous, read the Instant Messages which Hastert and Co. say they saw for the first time last week and then told Foley he had to go.
I'd be interested in your pointing out to me what emails should have prompted Hastert to swing into "action" particularly since the FBI saw the same emails and weren't concerned in the least.
Why how very noble of you, scumbag.
If the RATS get control of Congress, there will be amnesty for illegals, higher taxes, impeachment hearings, Al Qaeda bill of rights... etc.
And you're sitting there whining like an effing troll about "lack of action when the leadership became aware of the e-mails"?
Way to go McHenry!
Being under oath does not stop a Democrat from lying.And they[the Democrats] know that they have the same chance of being prosecuted for perjury as the sun has to rise in the west so long as the Republicans are in power.
“Is the American public to believe that neither of you nor your staffs nor anyone associated with your staffs had prior knowledge or involvement with the release of Foley’s e-mails and/or explicit instant messages? Is the American public to believe that ABC News stumbled haphazardly on this story without Democratic assistance?” wrote McHenry, a freshman Republican who has emerged as an attack dog for the GOP. He asked that Pelosi and Emanuel offer a “yes or no” answer as to whether they would go under oath “to assure the American people that neither you nor your staffs had prior knowledge or involvement — at the strategic or tactical levels — with the release of Foley’s e-mails and/or instant messages.”
WTG McHenry! I want to see more Republicans nailing these people for what they did tomorrow morning. Got that GOP staffers? I know you are reading the board. Follow McHenry's example.
Pelosi can say whatever she wants... put her under oath!!
And how about checking out the newest info on the steamy instant messages....that they were between Foley and a consenting 18 year old ADULT.
There was no lack of action, they took it as far as they could without be accused of attacking a gay Congressman without sufficient evidence. That's why it is so important to know who knew about the more explicit IMs before this past week. It looks like Nancy Pelosi is suspect.
When it comes out that the IMs were with an adult, this is going to blow up in the Dim's faces, big time!
I agree, I think Hastert should have cut Foleys gay nuts off after he found Foley asked a Kid for a Picture.
(Problem for Hastert, Foley denied he was Gay till now)
After all, we know gays have no morals. Just look at the Democrats, former Gov of New Jersey or Barney Frank.
Hastert should purge the gays from the house as Dems seem to be inisting. If any member rumored to be Gay, call the FBI. That is now the Democrats clarion call. Hastert should run with it.
I wish I lived in this guy's district. He must be the only politician in the country with courage.
Hook them up to a polygraph while we have them sitting still.