Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McHenry seeks sworn Dem account [Wants Pelosi, Emmanuel under oath re: Foley]
The Hill ^ | October 5, 2006 | Josephine Hearn

Posted on 10/04/2006 7:11:56 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
Although this is worthy of investigation, it in no way exonerates the GOP leadership for its lack of action when the leadership became aware of the e-mails.
1 posted on 10/04/2006 7:11:59 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Finally someone with a pair.


2 posted on 10/04/2006 7:16:25 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Do you know the difference between the e-mails and the IM's?

If not, perhaps you should apologize and stop posting this kind of stoopid commentary...........

3 posted on 10/04/2006 7:17:29 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

ping


4 posted on 10/04/2006 7:19:32 PM PDT by zip (((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Newt Gingrich started this way.


5 posted on 10/04/2006 7:20:25 PM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Although this is worthy of investigation, it in no way exonerates the GOP leadership for its lack of action when the leadership became aware of the e-mails.

You seem pretty upset that perhaps no more GOP members will fall. I can't recall you ever not being on the attack here against one GOP member or another. Quite a pattern.

6 posted on 10/04/2006 7:20:32 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
How many times do you have to be told?

They just found out about the e-mails when the story broke.
7 posted on 10/04/2006 7:20:46 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
“They were passed to a colleague of mine from a source, not someone from a Democratic campaign, a source on the Hill,” Sauer told Democracy Now Tuesday.

Was his name Armitage?


8 posted on 10/04/2006 7:20:52 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Amen


9 posted on 10/04/2006 7:21:00 PM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Although this is worthy of investigation, it in no way exonerates the GOP leadership for its lack of action when the leadership became aware of the e-mails.

It would probably be helpful for you to actually read the emails. Those are what Hastert and Co. say they saw last year. Then, when you realize they (the emails) were basically innoculous, read the Instant Messages which Hastert and Co. say they saw for the first time last week and then told Foley he had to go.

I'd be interested in your pointing out to me what emails should have prompted Hastert to swing into "action" particularly since the FBI saw the same emails and weren't concerned in the least.

10 posted on 10/04/2006 7:22:14 PM PDT by blake6900 (YOUR AD HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Do you know the difference between the e-mails and the IM's?

Sure do. It is an outrage that the Democrats try to blur the distinction between the two. It is equally outrageous that Republicans believe that the emails alone weren't worthy of investigation.

Does anyone think the GOP leadership was right in not pursuing the emails any more vigorously than they did? Was that really the right thing to do?

11 posted on 10/04/2006 7:22:44 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide (Hastert will not be Speaker by January 2007 (and should not))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

McHenry is pretty gutsy. Maybe he is the new Jesse Helms from the great state of NC.


12 posted on 10/04/2006 7:23:27 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

You've got the talking points down pat.


13 posted on 10/04/2006 7:24:02 PM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
when you realize they (the emails) were basically innoculous

I've read the emails. I find it shocking that you find them "innoculous" [sic]. As a parent, I can tell you that if a middle aged man sent those kinds of messages to my son, I would turn them over to the cops. I would not find such behavior innocuous.

14 posted on 10/04/2006 7:24:34 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide (Hastert will not be Speaker by January 2007 (and should not))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
"I hate to give up sources, but to the extent that I know the political parties of any of the people who helped us, it would be the same party,” Ross said."

Why how very noble of you, scumbag.

15 posted on 10/04/2006 7:24:52 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter ("And you got that little smirk on your face, and you think you're so clever!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I applaud McHenry...but, it doesn't matter...Pelosi and Emmanuel would LIE under oath...just like Bubba did.


16 posted on 10/04/2006 7:25:57 PM PDT by Txsleuth (FREEPATHON TIME----You need FR, you know you do, so how about donating??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

If the RATS get control of Congress, there will be amnesty for illegals, higher taxes, impeachment hearings, Al Qaeda bill of rights... etc.

And you're sitting there whining like an effing troll about "lack of action when the leadership became aware of the e-mails"?


17 posted on 10/04/2006 7:26:36 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Your right. Pelosi is nothing but socialist scum.


18 posted on 10/04/2006 7:26:56 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Way to go McHenry!


19 posted on 10/04/2006 7:28:13 PM PDT by mystery-ak (My Son, My Soldier, My Hero........God Speed Jonathan......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
I've read the emails. I find it shocking that you find them "innoculous" [sic]. As a parent, I can tell you that if a middle aged man sent those kinds of messages to my son, I would turn them over to the cops. I would not find such behavior innocuous.

Fair enough...but, as I recall, I asked you to point out which ones brought about this reaction to you and so far you've simply reiterated the "Hastert Must Go" rhetoric. I don't think you've read them at all and I'll bet you're doing a quick search right now to cover your ass. Good luck.

20 posted on 10/04/2006 7:29:21 PM PDT by blake6900 (YOUR AD HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson