Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Hill
This is why the Republicans do not need any gay members. Being gay is not family moral consistent.
10 posted on 10/04/2006 10:40:38 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill

The issue isnt being gay. It is homosexuality today but it will be something else tomorrow. It is the violation of this social compact we have had that some things were off limits.

For instance what if a politician had a weakness and had a affair years ago. Should that be out. That is what we are coming too.

Unless the Virgin Mary and St Peter and like come back down from Heaven and run for Congress we are stuck with falliable and flawed individuals like ourselves as politicians.


31 posted on 10/04/2006 10:47:44 AM PDT by catholicfreeper (Geaux Tigers SEC FOOTBALL ROCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
This is why the Republicans do not need any gay members. Being gay is not family moral consistent.

We're now being given an object lesson in why unrepentant, active homosexuals have always been a liability, whether in politics, the military, religion, or the workplace....

Will the stupid party take heed? Somehow, I doubt it.
50 posted on 10/04/2006 11:00:41 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson