[New Girl]

Give me a break. Unless all the emails are released which reenforces inappropriatness I don't see any problem here. The fact that only SOME text is released should be cause for suspicion of the motive(s)

Perhaps, you're right. I'll reserve judgement until Foley's office releases the full text of all of the emails. They should have no problem doing so since the emails were purely professional.

[pissant]

Don't hold your breath. LOL

[af_vet_rr]

Perhaps, you're right. I'll reserve judgement until Foley's office releases the full text of all of the emails. They should have no problem doing so since the emails were purely professional.

If they were purely professional, they would not have been from his personal AOL account, they would have been from his Congressional, "official" email account(s) (and probably handled by a staffer). The "official" account(s) leave an electronic paper trail and are, in theory above-board (as in somebody wouldn't be stupid enough to be doing illegal or illicit things through them).

As soon as I heard they were from his personal email account, I took his job out of the equation and said "what if this was some random older guy asking a 16 year old for this information" and my spider sense began to tingle. It would appear that my spider sense was right and the guy is a pervert.