Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: J Aguilar
Welcome to FR,
this coverup, if true, will take down the Socialists eventually, IF the media in Spain will touch the matter.

Is there more info translated to English on the altered reports?:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v495/kickjor/noticias/060922manipulacion.jpg

Everyone on FR who can read Spanish should check this out, truly audacious attempt to coverup what happened, IF the alterations are real.

The FR.com community hope to read more posts from you on the subject.
2 posted on 09/26/2006 2:30:53 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JerseyHighlander; GladesGuru

The translation of that diagramm published by EL MUNDO last week is here:

1. Reference of the report: The report revealed yesterday by EL MUNDO has the same reference numbers that the one handed over by the Interior Ministry to the judge Del Olmo.

[Del Olmo is the investigating judge in the 3/11 case]

2. Purpose of the report: in the orginal it is asked -Study, Analysis, and Forensic Report-. However, in the one sent to the judge it is only asked an "analysis of the samples".

3. Number of forensic experts: the original report points out that the analysis have been endowed to two experts of the National Police Corps and a technician. Nevertheless, in the second one, only one expert shows, moreover, he is not one of the previous.

4. Analytical techniques: in the report unveiled yesterday nine trials are carried out, while in the one from Interior [Ministry] only six are shown. Meaningfully, the "Bibliographic study" has been removed.

[Bibliographic study means searching files related to other cases looking for coincidences].

5. Different observations: in the original one it appears five observations. The first one points out that the substance found (boric acid) had been identified in the that same laboratory related to a search in a ETA hide-out. The third observation warns that the use of this substance by terrorists is very uncommon, and therefore it is possible that there be a link between the perpetrators of both events. Both observations have been supressed in the writing send to the National High Court [where the Office of Judge Del Olmo is].

6. Incongruity in the text: in the report that is included in the summary [of the 3/11 case], it is not understandable that it is said that "the first two pages" are signed, as this writing is composed of only two pages. In addition, plural is used: "signatures", but only one person signs it. The forger may have committed a mistake as he copied the phrase from the original document.

7. Date: the original report was signed on March 21, the one sent to the judge, the day 22.

Sadly, I don't think there is anything more translated, JerseyHighlander; but I'll do my best to keep all of you informed, now that not only American, but the international media as a whole does not dare to reflect what really is happening in Spain.

GladesGuru, I think this guys learnt these public opinion manipulation techniques from Joseph Stalin and Joseph Goebbels.

For instance, yesterday they tried to divert mounting pressure on 3/11 announicing that the Princess of Asturias is again pregnant, which means a Constitutional reform if she has a daughter again. Today all the Spanish media, even EL MUNDO, had to reflect the matter as main news.


6 posted on 09/26/2006 5:52:29 AM PDT by J Aguilar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson