Short answer. . . .
Posted on 09/15/2006 9:54:14 PM PDT by jdm
ping
WHAT'S UP WITH THIS? A yankee newspaper in the Bluest town in the USA......speaks the truth about Iraq?
Good Lord. Somebody please send Lucifer some insulated underwear, because it's cold down there!
We just keep proving it and the libs just keep plugging their ears and saying, "Didn't happen, didn't happen, didn't happen."
Saddam's own documents prove the connection. They could be the Iraqi Venona. Perhaps that is why liberals don't want anyone to know about them. After all, Anna Nicole Smith is much more important than any of this stuff.
Its the Boston Herald...not the Globe. The Herald is much more tolerable.
I remember the $25,000 rewards that SaDamn was offering the familes of pallies that done bload themselves up.
Today Mike Savage was using the Senate report to say Saddam didn't have any ties to terrorists to bash Bush.
Just imagine how this process would unfold. The scum would, in no time, be reduced to advancing arguments, in public, that would sound more or less exactly like those being used by the defense in the courtroom proceedings against Saddam.
The President and his staff would have months to place the whole record of the run-up to the war before the public. The feckless and inept posturing that has characterized the scum strategy from day one would be there for all to see.
Talk radio, led by Rush, would have a field day. The blogosphere would glow like a reactor way past critical.
And, what if, in the middle of all this, with foppish scum-buckets like John Conyers and Charlie Rangel and Nancy Pelosi and Henry Waxman and Alcee Hastings and William Jefferson, Scum-o-crat, Lousiana, all competing with one another to see which can sound more extreme and look more unattractive... what if right in the middle of this maelstrom, there is another terrorist attack on our country. The bad guys thought we were distracted, so they took a shot, and sank it.
As I said, a more cynical person than me might reason that such a chain of events would finish the Scum for the next 20 years.
Not me, of course. But then, I'm not worried about losing the House, either. I'm not sure why I care about the Senate, though, I'm bound to admit.
(steely)
Why doesn't the Administration promote this? Instead, tehy seem to want to be PC and bury it. They should be trumpeting this kind of evidence. How is it that Deroy Murdock can get it but the White House can't?
The Herald is owned by the owners of the New York Post.
I don't think you heard Savage correctly. He has been a major supporter of the War on Terro, including the war in Iraq. He is convinced, however, as I am, that we're not fighting hard enough. We seem to be pursuing a no-win strategy.
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
I not at all sure the Islamos even know which end is up with respect to American politics. The few that I've ever talked to are unshakably convinced that our entire political system is a sham, and that the President and every other person in the government is put there by the Jews.
If there are any who care, I'm sure they root for the Democrats.
Thanks for that info.
Short answer. . . .
Don't you love it when chickens come home to roost? LOL
Ikez78 - you'll want to read this one too.
I've been saying this for almost three years now. I hope the Bush administration defends their pre-war assertions tooth and nail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.