[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

"everybody who opposes Dog's arrest is happy that we grabbed Lester(sic), who did the same thing." Hardly the same thing! Luster was wanted for what?

"Lastly, the claim that Mexico "refused" to return Lester(sic) for trial is a LIE. According to THIS CBS STORY, the bounty hunters discovered Lester(sic) but never asked the local police to arrest him, so we have no idea whether mexico would have turned him over to us:"
Well, we have no idea, but, Mexico had made no real moves to find the guy, and Dog found him in three days! In this case, fears of Mexico doing nothing, or throwing a monkey wrench into the works, seem well-founded!

[CharlesWayneCT]

Dog found him based on a tip from someone who gave the same tip to the FBI, who was going to arrest Luster during the same time period.

IN any case, I disagree that this is about how bad Luster is. This is about whether the United States will live up to it's extradition treaty obligations, when requested to by official government request.

To suggest that George Bush is personally involved in the extradition request of some bounty hunter because Fox called him up and threatened to expose some dark secret is, frankly, insane.

I can't fathom why otherwise intelligent people really think our President has ANY idea this is happening. Do you really think that the war on terror isn't occupying him enough?

Not you personally, just some of the people posting to this thread.