To: ct_libertarian
LIEberman is no choice....I refuse to believe the "he has no chance" bunk. If that's the case he should have stepped aside and allowed a winner to take the lead. I don't see a difference between Lamont or LIEberman and neither should get support.
437 posted on
09/13/2006 10:47:58 AM PDT by
RasterMaster
(Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
To: RasterMaster
I don't see a difference between Lamont or LIEberman
That's because you don't live here.
The CT GOP tried to get Schlessinger to step aside and he refused.
Now they have a non-candidate with a gambling and identity scandal.
The truth of it is he stands NO chance.
I swallow this bitter pill by realizing that the vote is really message to the Dems: Do we support the moderate or the netkook wing.
Unfortunately, that's what the race here is.
456 posted on
09/13/2006 10:52:51 AM PDT by
ct_libertarian
("Who Is John Galt?" Ayn Rand)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson