Posted on 09/10/2006 6:28:09 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
Part one shown on Australian TV this evening.
Don't miss it, my Freeper friends. It's no wonder the Clintonistas have thrown everything at ABC/Disney, in a desperate effort to have the miniseries cancelled. Documents exactly what we've been following over the years on FR. Brave agents on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Dedicated people at Langley and the J. Edgar Hoover building, working around the clock to capture or kill Bin Laden, Ramzi Yusef et al. And all their efforts derailed by Clinton appointees like Berger and Allbright- selfishly putting their own careers (and covering their asses) before protecting the USA. The line of the show delivered by the actor playing Masood, brave and charismatic leader of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan:
...are there any men left in Washington? Or are they all cowards?....
Take the phone off the hook, and don't miss it. All the best, Byron
No wonder ABC did it without sponsors. The Dems would have strangled the Sponsers until they withdrew
I still am suspicious. This series is totally out of character for ABC AND to do it without sponsors sure indicates that they knew there would be a price to pay yet they continue.
I'll believe it when I see it. There has got to be more to the motivation behind this. It just doesn't follow that ABC would do this. It doesn't make sense. There is more that we don't know and can't see going on here.
That's an excellent point you make. The 'no sponsor' thing REALLY BOTHERS ME. TV companies produce shows for one reason, and one reason ONLY. MONEY.
I have wrestled with their motive or agenda also.
.
I too hope we see the Aussie version of 'Path to 9/11' tonight here in America on ABC/Disney.
But I sure wouldn't also want another TV Disaster Coverage event take place at the same time, diverting attention away from it, either.
For,
.."It's the TV, Stupid, no matter WHO pays for it"..
...is still the CLINTONS' lifetime M.O.,
...n'est-ce pas..?
.
TY for the info!
And if the Clintons were as well connected as they used to be, this program would never have been created or it would have been created with a Clinton slant.
It's good to see this program get as far as it has. It will be great to see it go all the way and get broadcast here in the U.S., unedited.
...are there any men left in Washington? Or are they all cowards?....
It'll be good for the American sheeple to get some exposure to Masood. This was a great leader of men, a great soul, and a man who held fast to upright principles in a time and a place where it was exceptionally difficult to do so.
I well remember shedding a few tears when I heard the "Lion of Panjshir" had fallen, and feeling extremely bitter about the paltry and tepid support he'd received from American and other liberal democracies. I had no idea, of course, how soon I would shed more tears and feel more bitterness.
RELATED THREADS, 9/11 and Path to 9/11:
The Truth about Bill Clinton and Terrorism (FR Compilation Thread) at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1697884/posts
Live Thread of The Path to 911 (Part I) at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698873/posts
Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697413/posts
Dems Send Threatening Letter to ABC - and misspell word in second paragraph. at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697561/posts
Democratic Bloggers Plan to 'Google Bomb' Controversial 9/11 Docudrama at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697579/posts
Dick Morris: Clinton Attack 'Outrageous' at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697490/posts
BILL SICS LEGAL EAGLES ON ABC (Libs in Panic Mode) at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698849/posts
Letter from Dem Leaders to Disney to Cancel 'Path' Broadcast at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697777/posts
Thwack! Will Democrats Never Learn? at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697676/posts
Accuracy aside, ABC's '9/11' deserves to bomb (LEFTY 'TV CRITIC' ISSUES WARNING) at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697680/posts
KEYWORD: 911 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=911
BASIC OLDER POST: Berger rejected four plans to kill or capture bin Laden at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1177555/posts
These are the clips that THE CLINTONS WANT CENSORED! The clips they want edited out are posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698800/posts?page=95#95
http://www.redstate.com/blogs/krempasky/2006/sep/09/abcs_path_to_9_11_clip_synopsis or
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/clinton_abc.html or these: http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58753/video.mov and
http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58763/video.mov and http://media.revver.com/broadcast/58767/video.mov
keywords for search engines: 911, Path to 911, PATHTO911, Twin Towers, Ground Zero, Pentagon, Sept. 11th, September 112001, 2001,
ABC miniseries, docudrama,documentary,ABC,Berger,Clinton,SandyBurglar,Rudy,RudyGiuliani,W,GeorgeWBush,Bush,
flight93,LetsRoll,"Let's Roll!",Todd Beamer,Bin Laden,Osama
My heartfelt sympathies. I think your comment deserves extra attention, so I'm reposting it here. You might want to consider copying and emailing THIS page to everyone you can in their memory.
Many thanks, good sir. No reply necessary...
And they smell.
Rush recently insinuated that we know what documents that sandy burglar took.
Looks like the clips were just taken down!
Has Clinton gotten to them too?
You're right! They have taken down the clips from Redstate.
Also, traditionalvalues.org site is busted (can't find the server).
"And all their efforts derailed by Clinton appointees like Berger and Allbright- selfishly putting their own careers (and covering their asses) before protecting the USA" ~ Byron_the_Aussie
I've heard Buzz Patterson on quite a few radio talk shows in the past several days, and he said that the movie lets Clinton off the hook by leaving the impression that Sandy Berger and M. Albright were responsible for why he failed to act. He also said that Wesley Clark comes off looking a lot better than what the real case was. Patterson was "there", and said he knows better in both cases.
More:
Clinton aide says 9-11 film 'correct' {military attaché saw aborted attacks on bin Laden}
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | September 8, 2006 | Art Moore
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698028/posts
And we are led to believe the info contained in those clips is/was fiction???? If so, what are they so concerned about? I'm glad I got the chance to see them early last night before they went bye-bye.
but we will never know what the notes in the margins on those documents were.
I also believe this is why Burglar took the documents out of the archives and likely replaced them with the Clinton version of events instead of the original documents.
If Col Patterson's claims were NOT true--he would have been sued for slander/defamation of character a long time ago by Slick, Berger, Albright, Lanny Davis, etc, and the slew of incompetent members of the Slick Administration.
The fact that they were all virtually silent on Col Patterson's charges until now,,,,and have taken NO legal action--speaks volumes about the accuracy of Col Patterson's claims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.