Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush wants to renew Social Security push after vote
Reuters News Service ^ | Sept. 9, 2006 | Reuters News Service

Posted on 09/09/2006 2:18:37 PM PDT by Dubya

WASHINGTON - President Bush hopes to revive his plan to overhaul the U.S. Social Security retirement program if his Republican party keeps control of the Congress in the November midterm elections, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday. ADVERTISEMENT

Despite polls suggesting Democrats have their best chance in years to regain control of the House of Representatives, Bush told the newspaper in an interview he was confident a power shift was "not going to happen."

"I just don't believe it," he said, adding that if Republicans prevail at the polls, next year might be a good time to reintroduce the effort to reshape Social Security because he could "drain the politics out of the issue."

Bush was forced to abandoned his 2005 push to add private accounts to the retirement program, in part because of concerns among Republicans that the unpopular plan would jeopardize their chances in this year's elections.

Some Democrats have emphasized the Social Security reform plan in their campaign to oust Republican incumbents in November, contending it would inject too much risk into the program and push the government deeper into debt.

Bush made Social Security investment accounts a top domestic priority for his second term, arguing such a system would help young people by putting the retirement program on a more sustainable financial footing.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; 2006agenda; bush43; issues; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: cajun-jack
To: XXXXXX

Disrespecting the president by referring to him as "Jorge" is a personal insult to me and every other member of this forum that supports him and I see it as a disruptive tactic of a common DU troll. When you post like a DU troll, don't be surprised when you get banned like a DU troll.

25 posted on 08/27/2006 11:35:51 PM EDT by Jim Robinson

21 posted on 09/15/2006 11:15:56 AM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack; onyx; 1035rep
whore-hey is good on the war but a sissy sub bitch on everything else

..... and you may just be a cajun-jackass.

22 posted on 09/15/2006 11:16:12 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( How much freedom of speech you enjoy depends on who you insult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Good job!


23 posted on 09/15/2006 11:18:07 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

You should have seen his post that was deleted in another thread. Very disrespectful.


24 posted on 09/15/2006 11:19:15 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Just roll whatever amount of money workers up to the age of 50 have contributed into SS into a private IRA or 401(k) plan and repeal the payroll tax.

Do that, but keep the tax, but have it go directly into 401(K) accounts, by-passing the treasury and congress altogether.

Which is what SS should have been when it was adopted rather than the ponzi scheme we have now.

25 posted on 09/15/2006 11:19:37 AM PDT by AFreeBird (If American "cowboy diplomacy" did not exist, it would be necessary to invent it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea; cajun-jack; 1035rep


cajun jack thinks he's cute and clever but he's neither.


26 posted on 09/15/2006 11:19:58 AM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

The best solution for Socialist Security is to dismantle the whole thing. It's a fraudulent Ponzi scheme. Everyone should have the option of receiving a lump sum payment now. This would be the total of all employee and employer contributions plus interest since inception. Younger workers, those under 50, would most likely take the lump sum. Older workers and those already receiving benefits can stay in if they want, or take a lump sum, adjusted as needed for benefits already paid out. Stop all new participants and taxes now. In about 20 to 30 years it would die of natural causes. This whole process would add hundreds of billions of dollars to private capital markets, creating an economic boom and prosperity, the likes of which we have never seen.


27 posted on 09/15/2006 11:21:59 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

Investing at 0 to 1% shuld be unpopular!


28 posted on 09/15/2006 11:23:00 AM PDT by Toby06 (Hydrogen is not a fuel source! Hydrogen is an energy storage method, like a battery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Here's thought. Get someone to figure out how much money the average American would have made/saved under the original Bush plan five years ago vs. what was made under the current plan. I've love to see the diffence. I bet it would make a great point.


29 posted on 09/15/2006 11:25:34 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

You could be something if you tried....nah..probably not


30 posted on 09/15/2006 12:07:27 PM PDT by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

and you might be just a dumbass


31 posted on 09/15/2006 12:08:19 PM PDT by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cajun-jack

Bye troll


32 posted on 09/15/2006 5:49:51 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
I'd take that, but we'd have to raise tax revenue elsewhere to pay for the benefits for current recipients.

No need to.

Economic growth would fuel it.

33 posted on 09/15/2006 5:51:40 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

WTF - this president is out of touch ...


34 posted on 09/15/2006 5:55:20 PM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
No need to. Economic growth would fuel it.

Most likely. That's why I chose the term "revenue" rather than "rates".

35 posted on 09/18/2006 4:51:28 AM PDT by kevkrom (War is not about proportionality. Knitting is about proportionality. War is about winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson