Replies

"Look at the source. It's laughable that anyone believes this stuff."

You "look at the source", NY! This is Adnkronos, a highly respected Italian news agency, which publishes in Italian, English, French and Arabic.

What we are talking about here is Muslim-on-Muslim crime, so what is in it for the Serbs to "fake it" as you imply?

Fikret Abdic actually won as president of Bosnia, with far more votes than Izetbegovic and Abdic was the true "moderate Muslim" of the two. But Izetbegovic forced Abdic out. Abdic then raised an army that fought against Izetbegovic & he made peace with the Serbs, but the idiot Clinton sided with Izetbegovic & his Iranian sponsors against Abdic. Abdic's forces lost and many of them currently live in Serbia, now.

Here is an excerpt from a book review from a Bosnian Muslim named Sanel Hadzic, reviewing the book "Fool's Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO & Western Delusions" by Diana Johnstone:

* "For me the best point in Johnstons book is the story of Fikret Abdic, my leader and a leader of true moderate muslims. He was widely known as "Babo", a truly moderate muslim which wanted Bosnia to stay within Yugoslavia. As Diana states, his story has been never told in West since it doesn't fit in to "official" version of truth: How could Alija Iztebegovic and his followers be moderate when compared to Abdic and his followers? First one was a radical Muslim connected with most radical Muslim countries and organizations and the other one was a moderate Muslim who believed in mutual coexistence of Muslim and other cultures.That is precisely why Iztebegovic saw Abdic as the greatest danger and war actions against him were the most severe. This is why around 70 000 of us, who supported Abdic had to escape as refugees- to Serbia!"

then read Peter Brock,

http://www.mediacleansing.com/

The source is correct. The information is absolutely correct. The planned entrance to the Balkans began even before Clinton. You won't read it on any pro-Albanian media, nor UN nor U.S. Government page. The State Dept. then published inaccurate and wrong information but supported the media reports. We introduced the Bosnian independence notion by helping the Muslims declare Jihad against the Serbian government. Granted, they stupidely reacted with a heavy hand, but no rape camps existed, no 8,000 Muslims massacred.....and and on. Were rapes committed yes.....on both sides...were murders committed...yes, on both sides....We take a criminal and make him a president of a province....Ceku. We allow Mafia figures and war criminals to be political party leaders; Ramush and Thaqi....among others...These are reports are right on target.

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/mostert/060829

http://www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/057.shtml

this link is a true story, regardless that is from Serbianna. It can be supported historical fact. Bush + Clinton + Bush are all on the same page certainly when it comes to the Balkans. I was there for five years and saw it myself. I worked closely with UN and Military personnel, many of which were American Military officers behind closed doors and during their 6 month deployment, confided in me that "we supported the wrong side"....We contracted MPRI to advise the Macedonian Forces against the NLA. We covertly contracted a small contingent of MPRI to advise the NLA at the same time.

It's a mess for sure and not well understood by many.......We also know that Islam is trying to get a foothold in the Balkans, so we are meeting the fanatist on both fronts, but in the meantime, falsely demonized a culture and aided in the KLA continuous attacks against Serbs even up to this day................