While I realize that all RATs are intrinisically evil, there is something about that BenVeniste character that takes evil to a whole other level. I think he had something major to do with Watergate - some sort of RAT counsel or something of that sort. He always has the appearance of a furry, multilegged creepy crawly thing that you see when you turn over a large rock in the woods. This guy oozes evil from every pore. Hollywood's central casting couldn't come up with a more convincing villain. Some day I predict we're going to find out something about this slimeball that will make even seasoned political observers blanch.
Oh also, I don't happen to like the guy :)
It's great how the media is giving the opponents of this movie ample time to dispute what it contains. Just like they did when Michael Moore's movie came out... uh... nevermind.
"Mr. Bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1991, then he went to Sudan. And we'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."
Dems still insist that Clinton did not refuse to take bin Laden when offered.
>>And early reviews among veterans of the Clinton White House are decidedly negative: They argue that the show downplays the Bush White House’s culpability<<
That's right. Bill Clinton did absolutely nothing in his 8 years in office, but since George Bush didn't do enough in his 8 months in office, its Bush's fault.
Anyone that doesn't get the logic of that needs to be flogged, shot and forced to watch Rahm Emmanuel on the floor of the House for 6 hours straight.