Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can the GOP Be Saved? Perhaps
Human Events ^ | September. 5, 2006 | PATRICK J. BUCHANAN

Posted on 09/05/2006 9:16:54 AM PDT by Reagan Man

Like the famous racehorse Silky Sullivan, Sen. Rick Santorum is known as a great closer. Yet, months ago, he had been virtually given up for dead by pundits in his race against Bob Casey, Jr., son of the popular, pro-life, former Democratic governor of Pennsylvania.

One poll early this year had Santorum down 23 points, an almost insurmountable deficit. A Strategic Value poll had Santorum down 16 points.

Now the senator who had been written off is finishing fast. An average of all polls monitored by the RealClearPolitics.com website finds him trailing by 6 points. The most recent Strategic Value poll confirms it. Casey is at 47; Santorum, 41 and rising.

What accounts for the surge? The Washington Times traces it to one issue: "Republican strategists say Santorum's tough stand on immigration has become a key factor." No. 3 in the Senate leadership, Santorum was the highest-ranking Republican to vote against the McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill that would open a path to U.S. citizenship for 10 million of the aliens who have either broken into our country, or are breaking the laws by being here, plus grant a full pardon from all civil and criminal penalties for the companies that employed them. McCain-Kennedy would further empower corporations to go abroad and hire what unions once called "scabs" to bring here to take jobs Americans cannot take at Third World wages.

"We did a certain amount of internal polling and when it got to immigration, it was very clear," says Santorum's media consultant John Braybender, who prepared two tough ads on immigration. "Rick's position versus Casey's was overwhelming. If Casey or anyone else thinks this is not an issue in Pennsylvania, they should start talking to voters."

Backing up Braybender is the same Strategic Value poll that found 79 percent of Pennsylvanians opposed to amnesty and 82 percent favoring a wall on the Mexican border. Pennsylvanians, like the rest of America, want the border secured and the illegals sent home.

But what will it take to wake up Karl Rove, lately sighted at the Los Angeles convention of the National Council of La Raza, where he won cheers for urging legalization of "undocumented" workers and boos for speaking of border security? (The literal translation of La Raza is "The Race.") Imagine the reaction to David Duke organizing a "National Council of The Race."

Two months from election day, Republicans, divided over Iraq, amnesty, spending, the loss of manufacturing and an economy that has left the working class treading water while the investor class is singing "Happy Days Are Here Again," are looking at the prospect of something somewhere between a defeat and a rout, or a massacre.

Yet if Republicans wish to hold Congress, despite what they may deserve, the Bushites could do no better than to borrow from the Santorum playbook. What can Bush and Congress do in 60 days?

One, publicly set aside the amnesty and guest worker provisions of the McCain-Kennedy bill. Bush cannot get them passed by the House in any event. Second, extract and enact the most urgent and popular provisions of both the Senate and House bills.

Bush should request $3 billion to $4 billion to start a security fence along all major crossing points for drug-dealers, coyotes and illegals. Then have Homeland Security begin systematic and public deportation of felons and gang members who are not U.S. citizens. Tattooed thugs being put on planes in cuffs will do the GOP and nation a world of good.

The FBI can provide the names. It has been tracking MS-13, or Mara Salvatrucha, the most vicious and violent gang in the hemisphere, with tens of thousands of members in the United States, for a year now.

Then call on Congress to reclaim its authority to denaturalize and deport any new citizen whose conduct -- applauding Al Qaeda or engaging in gang activity -- suggests they lied to become U.S. citizens. Bush could then tour the border again and, this time, shake hands with a few of the Minutemen patriots he earlier derided as "vigilantes." Unfortunately for the GOP, Rove & Co. believe that if Republicans take the hard line on illegal immigration that Pete Wilson took in 1994, the GOP will be as dead nationally as it has been lately in California. They forget: Wilson converted a 20-point deficit into a 10-point victory, captured both houses of the legislature and brought in four new GOP congressmen.

Arnold is the only other Republican to win statewide since then, and he ran against driver's licenses for illegals. No Republican who has taken the Rove-La Raza line has ever won the Golden State. Why is the GOP so mindlessly pursuing a transparently losing strategy? In pandering to La Raza, Rove may be playing for the long run. But as Lord Keynes said, in the long run we are all dead, which is where Republicans are headed if they don't get it right on this issue. Like Rick Santorum.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; borderbot; bordersecurity; buchanan; bushamnesty; fortressamerica; goawaypat; illegal; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; invasionusa; newmajority; openborders; patbuchanan; pitchforkpat; rmsp; senaterinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: WoofDog123

more fun to just complain


61 posted on 09/05/2006 11:37:51 AM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

"more fun to just complain"

why do you think this is fun? I do not think that every political discussion has to end with an 'answer,' particularly if that answer is based in fantasy so farfetched that it requires suspension of disbelief to consider. History and life are both full of examples where there were no practical (read - actually politically doable) options available in situations which became subsequently worse, and we are in the middle of one right now.

It is critical to understand that the immigration problem is going to change the face of the US in the current generation, and that discussion of this topic on message boards is perfectly reasonable and normal, and some of those discussing it aren't under the impression that they can somehow find a realistically implementable answer to the issue.

Or to put it another way, what is your solution to the current impasse, and how do you realistically see it being implemented?


62 posted on 09/05/2006 11:45:42 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Reagan Man; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; ...
Classic case of what's needed at home, which is strict border control and an end to illegal immigration (not quite the same thing) vs. our foreign policy.

I have become convinced that what is driving the Bush immigration policy for Mexico, or the lack thereof, is the fear that if, or perhaps more likely, when Mexico implodes, the rush for the border will truly become a huge tidal wave of illegal immigration, dwarfing today's huge tidal wave!

So, reasons our leader, we had better keep that "Safety Valve" open for as long as possible to prevent what's happening in Mexico right now, from REALLY happening. And, we had better keep those Wal-Mart Money Orders flowing, too.

In re Santorum, good luck to him. fine man. But if it's a close one, he had better pray for an election at least as straight as Mexico's. Which, of course is unlikely in any state run by Fast Eddie.

63 posted on 09/05/2006 11:52:14 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (What does it matter if we’re all dead, as long as the French respect us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
America is an amazing place and we have the ability to change, sometimes very quickly. Illegal immigration helps very few and hurts almost everybody. My "solution" is to first force solutions, to make all of us realize that this is a problem that must be addressed now. It starts with stopping new illegals without wrecking the economy and that means a fence and more Border Patrol/troops at the border. Punish the ones that get caught and send all of them home after jail time here. Then cut off the employment opportunities for the illegals by issuing a National ID card that can only be used for employment issues. Then a guest worker program with proof of employment a requirement for entry into the US. Finally, and I`m not afraid of the word, some sort of amnesty program for those that are already here. Nothing is going to get done if tossing out all of them is part of the deal.
Will it work? Think it has a chance if we work together. Or, we can be Tancredo lemmings and stop any positive changes cause we aren`t getting our way.
64 posted on 09/05/2006 12:26:34 PM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

gas is 2.33 at the get go in columbus at bethel and sawmill.


65 posted on 09/05/2006 1:03:21 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

I agree byby. Buchanan is a joke for appearing on the Dimwitted " McGlaughlin Group" where the Host has been predicting GOP Gloom since 1996


66 posted on 09/05/2006 1:14:56 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

Right freedom because there is no pressure out of power. If the GOP loses the House, they will not get it back for 20 years. Then the Conservatives can play Barry Goldwater electoral politics once again and be irrelevant.


67 posted on 09/05/2006 1:16:51 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Staytrue, I predict Terrorism and Gas Prices will be the focus of Election day 2006.


68 posted on 09/05/2006 1:18:00 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: varon
If the "patriots" who flap their jowls in the wind talking about the need for a secure border would have voted for Buchanan, then border security would not be an issue and the last 10 million illegals wouldn't be swarming all over our great land like maggots on a rotting carcass

If we all would have voted for Buchanan, Clinton would still have been elected President and I think it is unlikely Buchanan could have defeated either Gore or Lurch, so stop littering the ground with red herrings, they really begin to stink like troll when they've been in the sun awhile.
69 posted on 09/05/2006 2:04:32 PM PDT by attiladhun2 (Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Full employment and wage increases of 7% AFTER inflation for the first half of 06, to say nothing of 4.25% GNP growth has us "treading water?"

Maybe the RICH are getting 7% wage increases, but the MIDDLE CLASS has had negative real wage growth since 2003.

70 posted on 09/05/2006 2:29:54 PM PDT by AppleButter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
After the Republicans "get creamed", I suppose that the Rats will solve the illegal immigration problem.

No, they will make it WORSE in the short run, which will anger the populace so much that things will get BETTER in the long run.

However, maybe the new Congress,in Republican control and with a lot of input from voters, might do a better job.

Not a snowball's chance in Hell. You know the old saying, "The definition of insanity is doing the same old thing and expecting different results." As long as the internationalist Republicrats are elected back into office, they'll keep working to replace America's middle class with a Third World substitute better suited to their corporate goals.

71 posted on 09/05/2006 2:33:56 PM PDT by AppleButter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AppleButter

So,your plan to stop the illegals is to have the Republicans lose, and you are hoping that things will get so bad that the voters will smarten up, realize their error, and make Tom Tancredo King.
Mind if we try a different way first.


72 posted on 09/05/2006 2:55:11 PM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: AppleButter

Wrong. That increase in income was across ALL income groups. These were WAGES, not investment income. Additionally, during the same period hourly wage growth was up significantly. Stop buying into the DNC/Buchananite propaganda which reads off the same script these days.


73 posted on 09/05/2006 3:37:13 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Lol...that's a long way from me!


74 posted on 09/05/2006 3:41:38 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: inpolitic
Thats my problem with Pat, I`ve read his stuff. His attacks on "King George" helped bring us Bubba. His idea that we shouldn`t trade with other countries, his opposition to the Iraq War, coupled with his scare mongering on almost everything leave me cold. Its sad cause, before he thought people would vote for him, he was a hero.
76 posted on 09/05/2006 6:30:45 PM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: Welike ike; bybybill

If the GOP loses the House, they will not get it back for 20 years. Then the Conservatives can play Barry Goldwater electoral politics once again and be irrelevant.



You're right. The House has been the only place that conservatives have gotten any respect after election day. If the GOP loses control anywhere it's because they haven't been in tune with the party faithful. Over all, libs in the GOP have done less harm when the Dems were in control. The solution though is to hold control and replace Rinos when possible. Very little positive can be accomplished as a minority.


79 posted on 09/05/2006 7:24:49 PM PDT by freedomfiter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: inpolitic

Read the Wall Street Journal. They report on this information all the time. http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_econindicators_jobspict_20060707


80 posted on 09/05/2006 7:25:11 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson