To: omega4179
Remembered some more
*no steel structure has ever failed before
*therefore the planes did too much damage to the wtc
*there was just a 14 foot hole in the pentagon
*therefore the 757 did not do enough damage to the pentagon
*therefore the 757 did not hit the pentagon and was crashed out to sea by remote control
5 posted on
09/03/2006 5:32:12 PM PDT by
omega4179
(What have you done to help moderate muslims bring Islam into the 19th century?)
To: omega4179
There's a great documentary on 9/11 which began as a documentary on following a recruit for the NYFD from acceptance into the program through his first days on the job. It "coincidentally" put the cameras in place--both inside and out--of the Twin Towers for the tragedy.
This is a great documentary for high school kids.
7 posted on
09/03/2006 5:36:47 PM PDT by
bannie
(HILLARY: Not all perversions are sexual.)
To: omega4179
so there was a 757?
these DUmmies
10 posted on
09/03/2006 5:51:25 PM PDT by
npg
To: omega4179
I don't know what you are smoking or drinking. But you better check again. Steel will lose structural integrity at close to 1,000 degrees, bend and sag.
The structural damage and the intense heat from fuel, furniture, and paper etc, was enough to weaken the steel so that supporting beams would sag. Do you realize that the 757 carries more than 24,000 pounds of JP5? Better stop using that heroine laced with fentanyl.
135 posted on
09/04/2006 4:02:31 PM PDT by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson