To: zek157
"There wouldn't be a problem as long as it is framed as a health issue. BMI of 31 is serious fatass and unhealthy."
Tell that to Arnold Schwarzenegger. At his peak, the Governator had a BMI of 31. (6'2", 235 lbs.)
The BMI is not a suitable measure of fitness for body builders, and many other athletes. There are more suitable direct measures of % body fat. I doubt that Arnie had more than 12% body fat at his peak.
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Good post. My body fat is at about 11% or 12% but my BMI is somewhere in the low to mid 20's. BMI measures can be very misleading.
44 posted on
08/30/2006 12:58:10 PM PDT by
Obadiah
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
I'm surprised they are using BMI as the sole criteria. BMI can be misleading. I'm a pretty tiny person (5'4", 110 lbs), but by no means anorexic. That puts me at an 18.9 BMI, which by their definition would define me as underweight.
I'm very healthy - heredity was very good to me. I just happen to have the metabolism of a hummingbird. So I guess I shouldn't have fertility treatment?
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
I'm sure they are using skinfold or other method (weight in water?) for the proper BMI index?
49 posted on
08/30/2006 12:59:17 PM PDT by
zek157
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson