"It is particularly satisfying that this admission comes from two of the journalists—Michael Isikoff and David Corn—who did the most to get the story wrong in the first place and the most to keep it going long beyond the span of its natural life."
So why did these two dunder-heads finally decide to let the truth out? I'm confused on this one. Hell, Sandy Burglar was swept under the rug.. why didn't they do the same here??? Help anyone...?
I saw one of the authors on Softball. They have a very liberal way of twisting their story. No matter that this was a bunch of nothing that the White House had nothing to do with in the first place EXCEPT they used the info to attack Wilson. They were on a vendetta aganist Wilson. Yes they had nothing to do with the whole epsiode but they used it for political gain. ACCORDING to the nuty lefty reporter who everyone fawns over.