Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pukin Dog
I don't know what your friend in P-3s told you, but you have to remember that the P-3 is a prop plane, not a jet.

Yes, but it's a turbo prop, which means that it's not much different than flying a high by-pass turbofan, and virtually no different than flying a turboprop regional airliner. Except that the P-3 is larger than most or all of those.

Thrust reversers vs. reverse pitch on the props. And the P-3 is a many motor. Yes, other than the F-16 so are most jets, but they have the engines close together, rather than well separated. A matter of degree of course, the CRJ's engines appear to be about as far apart as an F-14s.

Overall though flying a P-3 would be closer to flying an airliner than flying a fighter, the P-3 being derived from the Electra airliner. Pilots are likely to have *much* more time at low altitude, with all that implies.

I suspect the story from the P-3 driver got garbled going through a relatively uniformed intermediary.

646 posted on 08/27/2006 3:39:19 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

647 posted on 08/27/2006 3:40:53 PM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato

The only obstacle I would see P-3 guys having getting a commercial job would be less PIC time with three pilots on every flight.


655 posted on 08/27/2006 3:59:45 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson